Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Z. Page 2 1355

Good tire, holds the road well at any speed, drove south at 160-180 km/h no problems!!! Has a low profile 215/45 R17, no cuts and no punctures!!! Minus: noisy, hard, somehow reminds of Bridgestone, but still softer. The tire is for those who drive fast and want it to hold the speed, and also handle well in aquaplaning. IT'S NOT FOR GOOD COMFORT))))

Braking and handling is good, handling on wet asphalt is the same as on dry asphalt, but I wouldn't ride in the mud, the tire is good only for asphalt. It's too stiff, can't compare to Continental ContiSport, in my opinion it's the best on the market (this is about Continental ContiContact).

Replaced the standard all-season tire. Previously, I preferred Michelin Pilot, but they were too soft. So far I've done a week on them, and I'm very happy. They are fairly quiet, with some rustling, but it's even kind of pleasant. They swallow bumps very well. They are well-suited for aggressive driving, and are optimally stiff. Water resistance is five stars, and driving on wet areas - puddles, ruts, etc. - is completely

Extremely quiet tire, the quietest I have ever tried on any vehicle. Comfort is also very good, my car weighs around 2Ton. UTQG rating on mileage is 300, so they should last for a while as well. I would definitely buy them again.

I'd rate these tires an 8 out of 10. First set I had around 26,000 miles on them, not bad at all really... This is the second set I've had and I've had the first set so I can't really fault them. Great traction in the wet and dry, never had a blowout. Since I have a Quattro, the four wheel drive push really helps with traction and they put the traction control knob down without the traction control cutting in even

The tire is excellent. I drove on it for two seasons. There were many different situations. It saved me from sudden braking on both dry and wet roads. The tread is quite firm. During the entire period of use, there was not a single crack or puncture on the tire. When the tire is warmed up, the car accelerates very well. During the summer, the fuel consumption decreased by about 0.5 liters. It efficiently removes water at high speeds. I had a case

I bought a set of 225/45/17 for my Accord Type S. Three days later, while turning right at 35 km/h, the entire right side of the tire blew out. I got it replaced under warranty. Many thanks. I've since driven another 30,000 km, and I was pleased with the tire's performance and handling. However, when I began to rotate the tires, I noticed that the top layer of the tread had cracked and separated on the inside of

Great tyre, very quiet and good grip on both dry and wet roads. Front tyre wear is quite high, especially at the edge after 12000km. Rear tyre is in very good condition. Used mainly on ‘Mountain’ roads, tyres should now be discontinued. Not used on snow.

Just like with any other tire, there are pros and cons. I'll start with the cons. I had the Sparta Contact 2 Mika before, and the Hakkapeliitta Z is clearly designed for a cool and rainy summer, which had been the case in St. Petersburg until recently. Therefore, the tire wear is higher than average, even when driving on asphalted roads at a moderate pace. This is a fact, and the most frustrating one considering the price of 18-inch

Ran on these tires for two seasons, never seen such a crack on a tire, had a curb damage, disc got damaged, the tire was all worn out, even though it was a 17x40 profile, in wet conditions they're terrible in turns, they try to go straight, in dry conditions they're great, like landing on a runway.