Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka C2. Page 2 50

Tires were not bad, but very soft, wore out at 60,000 km to the bald spot.

Soft ride, handling is great, just don't feel any road irregularities.

I'm buying a second set, the previous one lasted to the core, it lasted for 5 seasons.

Great tire, minimal wear, excellent handling on dry and wet roads (haven't tried on snow or ice), good braking and low noise. But no cherry without a pit - a bulge appeared on the third thousand of kilometers run on one tire! In the tire repair shop, they put a Kordovan patch, the bulge didn't go away, but it makes me feel better. Ran 20000 km, while twelve, but I wouldn't put it on the front. Maybe I

Good roadholding, easy to handle. The first set wore out to the cord, but it kept the pressure. I have now bought a second set and after 10,000 km the wear is normal.

Got them in 205/75/16. Very good tire. Most cost-effective option from the known brands! Already driven about 30,000 km and 2 seasons. I am sure I will drive at least another 2 seasons. I drive mainly on the highway. Acceleration and braking are predictable. Very durable. I recommend!

Tires are good, hold the road and overloading. As disadvantages - quickly worn out.

Holds the road perfectly well on dry and wet surfaces, extremely soft and quiet.

Summer tire. Quality supreme, after 30,000 miles the remaining tread depth is over 50%.

A surprisingly quiet Russian-made tire, provided the road surface is in decent condition. Riding over puddles at 60-70 km/h is no issue, and there was no noticeable aquaplaning even on an empty car. Overall, I'm quite pleased with the tire. In a sharp 90-degree turn at 40 km/h, it doesn't want to leave the road. The tread pattern is excellent, especially compared to the old Kama Euro 131.