Tyre reviews Кама Евро 129. Page 9 606
- Rate
The tire was on the new car when I purchased it. It has clocked approximately 45,000 km over three summer seasons without any complaints and could potentially be used for another summer. Overall, I am satisfied with it. Although it has some characteristics on the highway – after 160 km/h it requires attention as it starts to slightly drift off course, it enters into turns without problems on both dry and wet asphalt when entering at a reasonable speed. It starts to produce noise above 120 km
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Octavia
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Bought a car in March 2012, tires had already been on for a season, and I already drove for 2 seasons (50000km) and still have a few more left. So by wear resistance - 5+! Manageability is also good. Big minus - IT MAKES AN EXTREMELY LOUD NOISE!!! And that's all I can say, tires are good overall.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Focus 2 1,6L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Reasonable in price, unlike the last two years of complete inconsistency in the prices. Tires with the same design are not Chinese and the prices differ greatly.
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Accent 1,5L 2000-2002
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
3 years of total mileage at 30,000 km. I often overload the vehicle, so the struts have already been replaced, but the tires, damn, damn, damn, are holding up normally. There's one bulge, but I got it in a pothole and I've been driving with it for a year, and otherwise the side walls are showing off in the best light.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ Priora (2170) 1.5L 2007-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Fourth year on the road, worn out to around 50-60% for its mileage, no signs of aging, made in 2009.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Clio 1,6L 2001-2005
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Quite a decent attempt by the domestic manufacturer. At least, if it doesn't fly, then it drives comfortably. Tires are adapted to our roads, so when you hit the pothole, a puncture is unlikely. They also behave well on the dirt and the curb.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Note 1,4L 2005-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
As soon as I installed them, the car drove smoothly on wet asphalt. Before, there were always some instances of skidding, correcting trajectory with the steering wheel, and premature braking (just in case). Now, none of that is happening, and I'm driving normally.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I understand that it's not a standard choice, but presumably the previous owner was so ashamed of the worn-out tires that he refused to sell the car with them. I didn't change them, drove 2 months in 2012 and now I've replaced them again. The tire proved to be very good.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Note 1,5L 2005-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Started my third year, drive quite a lot mostly around the city. Hate potholes on our roads especially when they're filled with water, where you can't gauge the depth. Often I rely on my luck and drive over them. A couple of times it was really deep with sharp edges. But the tire is still looking good with no visible damage.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
There wasn't money for expensive tires, so I had to get this one. I was surprised that the car drove better than on the kumh. I even drove on snow on it, not by my own will, of course, got caught by a blizzard on a business trip, but got through without any trouble.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Spectra 1,8L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability