Tyre reviews Кама Евро 129. Page 5 606

Worth the tire. Handles well on dry and predictably on wet. Steers well, doesn't drop into potholes. Unloaded. No noise. No regrets.

The reason for the purchase was a simple case. When there was a need for urgent replacement of the existing set of tires on a LADA (a side cut on one side), there was a full set of these tires available at the nearest store. However, three months of using the LADA, there was a need to replace the wheels of a family Ford. The choice was already made deliberately in favor of KAMA Euro-129 tires.

Kama is Kama. Hard, noisy. One plus, wears out slowly. Grip on the road is mediocre, after that I switched to Dunlop SP Sport 9000 - it's like a different world. These were standard tires on my car from the factory. During the driving period, on two tires, I caught a massive bulge, therefore I decided to completely replace the tire.

It's time to leave a review of this tire. I've run it for 2 seasons, about 25,000 km. This spring I hit a huge pothole, the bulge didn't protrude, but I had to rebalance. It handles puddles well, confidence in cornering is there, predictable in turns. On dry asphalt, it grips well. Slightly noisy at 0, until it warms up.

Kama Euro 129 is the most affordable of the standard sizes, I've driven it for 2 years on a highway and it's okay in dry weather. However, as soon as it gets wet, it's like driving on sand. On the highway, it handles well and doesn't make much noise. The price covers all the drawbacks.

The tire was very good, on the road everything is predictable, no bulges after 40,000 km, uniform wear, no fear of potholes, the only drawback is the noise.

Good tire from a Russian manufacturer. On the highway, it shows itself very well, confidently follows the trajectory you set! Puddles it overcomes without even noticing them (didn't get stuck in huge ones). Elegant design under the Continental. Brakes perfectly. By the end of the season with moderate use, they have worn out by half, and that's it! I like it.

A bit noisy, but if there was good sound insulation in the Zhiguli, I think

Nothing would be wrong if the tread on both sides were directional. The right side pushes water from the puddle onto the side of the road, while the left side pushes it into the belly (and actually onto the hood). I drive to the left, three times I drove off the road. Turned out it was a matter of the tread pattern. Got registered to not buy products from this brand.

Spent one season. The positives include: good durability, the tread after 15,000 km looks like new, few cuts, no bulges, although the potholes were quite nasty! The negatives are: noisy, but most summer tires are, stiff, the joints are bumpy like a cat, but it swallows small irregularities well, at high speed on a wet road (over 90 km/h) some loss of grip. All in all, quite good for a relaxed

I put these tires on for summer because they are very attractive with their asymmetrical design. Many people put them on for that reason. I put them on because I couldn't find the ones I wanted. In reality, these tires are rubbish. They are hard, very noisy and don't handle water well. I was hoping that if they were hard, they would last longer. Yeah, right. It's been one summer and the tread depth has dropped by a third as if by magic. I