Tyre reviews Кама Евро 129. Page 11 606

I bought it at a very similar price, new tires removed from an Activa, tyre balancing on the same day, well-balanced, asked to mount on the sealant (just in case)

The next day, a 400km test run. The tire is soft, quiet, much quieter than the Continental Premium Contact 2, which was on it before. Potholes and irregularities are almost inaudible in the salon. It is heavy for my car, as it

Good tire, but too hard. The tread on the left side is cut in the wrong direction. There's a tendency to slide wide on hard acceleration, but no complaints about braking. I would recommend Kumho instead, the price is the same, but the specs are significantly better.

I bought new tires in 2010, they were perfectly balanced. I covered about 30,000 miles in two seasons, and during that time, they wore off by 60-70%. - that's too much - especially since I drive calmly. However, the tire is still very pleasing - it rides smoothly on wet roads and puddles, and also on dry roads, I'd rate it 4+. Summer I went many times to pick mushrooms on a forest road with potholes

Slow-speed, smooth and steady driving tire. Skids on the wheel during sudden braking, locks up during sudden acceleration, unpredictable during sharp turns, emergency braking on wet asphalt leads to an accident! I don't recommend buying, especially a new one (3500 roubles for R16), I got it with a new car, I'll definitely buy another one next summer!

The tire, uh-oh. Dunlop was the previous one, what a difference in the world. The tire, it's like a wooden clog. When the car starts up, it's really hard to get it to move. They messed up the left side tire so it's cut the other way, LOL. When you drive into a puddle at high speed, the entire puddle ends up on the windshield. In short, it's a complete disaster, but I have to give

The tire is so bad that I don't even know where to begin. It loses traction and skids on sharp turns, is extremely stiff, and loses air within 5 days if not inflated again. It can't be reinflated once the air has leaked off, as it's lost its seal: the wear is catastrophic. On the water it doesn't handle well, and the only positive thing I can say is that it brakes reasonably well (as long as you're going straight and not

I got myself a Camry 129. The tire holds the road well. That's a plus. The downsides are the noise and the weird thing about the tire's asymmetry. They took off the Continental's tire and could at least change the tread's mistake. The problem is that if you correctly install the tire (outside on the outside) then only the right side of the car's wheels will have proper water drainage. The two wheels on the left side will not fully drain water from

My driving style is moderate, tire size 205/55/16. In terms of manufacturing quality regarding sidewall bulges, the tire is simply terrible. In 2009, I bought 2 Kama tires, installed them, and on the highway, I hit a pothole, resulting in a bulge on one wheel. When spring 2010 arrived, I was faced with a choice: buy 3 more Kama tires or 4 tires from a different manufacturer (1

The tires were used on a Ford Fiesta ST 2L, handling is good, braking is a bit worse, quiet ride, relatively soft, over the given mileage there were no side bulges or anything, the tread remained relatively intact on which the car was sold, so I have nothing bad to say about the tires. If I had a similar car, I would buy them again.

In the 16th year, I put it on and since then I've only been buying it in pairs, the front ones wear out faster. A popular option. It suits all characteristics. Of the most unpleasant things, I can recall that after hitting a pit, I had to change one, although the alignment and disk repair cost more than a new tire itself.