Tyre reviews Кама Евро 129. Page 7 606

I'm very satisfied with the purchase! Good price, good traction, even compared to top-of-the-line Hako and Conti. At the same time, I have no complaints about the road holding or noise. Even on wet pavement, the turns are smooth and without any skidding, which I think is quite an amazing feat.

Experience of 129, only last year, and there I only drove on asphalt. But it drives well on asphalt. It's noisy, only on a certain black asphalt, there is a patch on the road 200 meters long, it's noisy there, but not on regular.

Based on last year's experience, I can say that the tire's grip on the car doesn't compromise. I didn't notice any obvious drawbacks. I mostly drive on asphalt and occasionally go on a picnic to a lake. For me, the most important thing is driving in the rain, as my vision is not very good and visibility deteriorates during rainfall. Last summer, all rain trips went smoothly, the tires held well, so no extreme situations arose.

I drove on the CE-129 in summer 2012. The idea of changing was only until the purchase of the Polo sedan. Those who shout that they cannot be driven on, simply have never driven on them. What Kama makes, may have been a problem before, but now it seems they have learned to do so.

From an operational point of view, I did not find any problems or manufacturer defects. The car rides on asphalt like rails, whether wet or dry. In the

Summer 2013 will be the third, with a mileage of around 18-20 thousand. When buying them, they said that they are very poorly balanced, but with cargo I got 5-5-10-20. On the asphalt, there are no complaints, also on puddles. Several times I got into the forest in the rain, nowhere I got stuck, although I was driving carefully over a wet spruce.

Everything is quite good for the price. There are no problems on wet and dry asphalt, aquaplaning for this price segment is probably the best. Last summer I drove up to 140 km/h through puddles and everything was fine.

Before I even put this tire on my Volkswagen, it already had over 50,000 km on it. The tire is quite stiff, which makes it very durable and resistant to wear. During the entire time of use, it didn't have a single crack or serious cut. On the asphalt, it holds the road at any speed, and I personally accelerated to 150 km/h in the rain. By the way, aquaplaning is also no issue, nor is the noise. In

One driving season, standing on the sidewall of Pirelli P6000. Suitable for Russian roads. Didn't get a puncture even after driving through several potholes in the rain. Good grip on wet and dry asphalt, aquaplaning is well-handled, can drive on the highway in a rainstorm without any major issues.

Excellent tire in terms of price-performance ratio. As a man who has been working in the tire business for a long time, I am quite satisfied with it. On my Camry, the tire does wear out faster, since the car is very heavy. However, I think it will last up to 40,000 km. Nokian's original tire wore out at 25,000 km. In short, it is a successful model.

Compared to bridgestone b250 (on official 2112).
bridgestone b250 doesn't hold on the wet road almost at all - barely, and it would have flown away.
Kama - no slipping, stands as a nail in.
By noise, bridgestone b250 is probably softer, but there is not a significant difference.
There is a possibility to change them in places ;) – but comparing, refused,