Tyre reviews Yokohama Geolandar A/T-S G012. Page 9 792
- Rate
Honestly, I bought it recently, but as soon as I put it on, I felt the difference that the pressure was increased. It's much softer now, less picky. It handles turns without a whistle, as if I'm driving on tape, very grippy. And in principle, it can be attributed to the category of quiet tires. Great tire!
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Drove a couple of weekends on Hakka Z 215/55/17, and convinced myself that the car became a real beast, how rigid it was. In a rut, it behaved, to say the least, - nothing at all. The salon was shaking, although soundproofing was made. And you can't even drive her in the mud.
A decision was made to take the Yakogama Geolander AT-S G012 in 215/60/17. The tire
- Vehicle:
- Subaru Forester 2,0L 1997-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Tires on 16 inches, I soon realized it would be always noisy, a bit of a pity considering the money spent, as I compared it to my Nokia which I previously drove and loved the silence. I haven't yet driven in the heat, but so far, wear is minimal over this mileage. I was very satisfied with the stability in water movement (I drove 20km in the rain from the dacha, or maybe it's the heavy car?). I regularly corrected during strong side
- Vehicle:
- Honda Stream 1,7L 2001-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I put these tires after I had blown the standard Kamuy-217 (left a review on it on 24.04.11). Now it has Yoko AA01 185/60/14. I've driven 3000 km on them. Compared to the Kamuy - it's earth and sky. On a dry road, it handles perfectly - the car doesn't skid and confidently holds the trajectory. On a wet track, everything is fine. During braking, everything is predictable
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
After Kumho, it's definitely heaven and earth!!! The road holds better and makes less noise. I was surprised that even fuel consumption decreased a bit! As for the drawbacks, I can say that it's better not to hit potholes - at least you'll get a puncture. As for what many people write about slipping on wet asphalt - it's nonsense, you just need to warm it up well! I noticed that the hotter it is outside, the more I like it! You
- Vehicle:
- Kia Spectra 2,0L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I didn't overestimate the tires, because they are my first summer tires. They grip the road very well in puddles and in the rain I didn't experience any problems - I accelerated up to 120, but I didn't make any sharp turns. The sidewall is soft, on a rough road it goes quite quietly, but you can hear how it slaps against the seams and deep cracks in the asphalt. On loose ground (sand, gravel) it floats a bit. I consider
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Carina E 1,6L 1992-1998
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
good stable neutral handling tires very dense grips a bit of traction and, as a rule, to push wide in faster turns they suffer a crash poorly through potholes and a bit noisy on the road too they also wear out quickly fronts lasted only 8500 miles to get 2mm tread depth not so good
- Vehicle:
- kia picanto
- Size:
- 165/60 R14 T
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Crashed the car! BUT TIRES WHERE FAB! Used for grip on the road like nothing else! Lil bitten to soft, but you get what you pay for FILLING TIRE. GREAT TIRES. PROBZ GNA BUY next model for my new car.
- Vehicle:
- audi A2 1.4 TDI
- Size:
- 175/60 R15 T
- Buy again?:
- Возможно
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
I've driven around 30-35 thousand now, the tread is almost gone, no softening, but I expected better wear, the tire itself is great on the wheel during balancing, more than 10 grams per wheel were not added, and one even came out with zero. My brother managed to wear out such a tire to the cord in just 3 months, I'm very disappointed in this tire and won't be buying it again.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Passat 1,9TD 2001-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Decent
Quite a decent tire. I didn't like how it behaves on a wet road, I had to sharply brake from 80 km/h, the car almost skidded. However, on a dry road, it showed itself perfectly. The price is more than reasonable.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance