Tyre reviews Yokohama Geolandar A/T-S G012. Page 1 792
- Rate
Well, I'll chime in too.
I installed this tire last summer, before a trip to Crimea, in size 215/70/16. I didn't buy it blindly, I read reviews about it beforehand. I bought it specifically for summer, but the spirit of an adventurer is a strong thing, and I decided to test it out in the winter. However, let's get back to order.
Since I bought it before Crimea, the main criteria for my choice
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Tucson 2,0L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Purchased knowingly as highway tires. Have been used for five summer seasons. Did not think to drive on these tires in the winter, such a thought didn't even come to mind. 1. Asphalt and etc. solid cover: Pleased with their durability, low rolling resistance at AI-92,95 consumption from 8 to 9 liters/100km (no better could be achieved). Good handling, no camber feel. Reasonably low noise level. The tires predictably lock up
- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Niva 1,8L 2000-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought in March 2011 205/70-15 on Shniva, immediately glued it to the machine! Of course, after the studs - silence and peace! I ride on the machine 50/50 track (city) and woods (beach). In the end, I got a pleasant confirmation of the POSITIVE reviews that I read BEFORE buying this tire! Everything is real: Noiselessness, regardless of the bold pattern - none (i.e. silence at any speed,
- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Niva 1,8L 2000-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
First there were Khumos, those from the shop, normal for me, not fish nor meat, fine. But they died completely. I was wavering between G012 and G051, the latter had a more highway-like tread pattern (at least on the stand) and it felt stiffer to the touch. I was plagued by doubts that G012 was too soft. And the tread pattern was just too off-roadish. But I trusted the positive comments and didn't regret it. Indeed
- Vehicle:
- Kia Sportage 2,0L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I used tires 185/65/14 from summer 2006 to summer 2011 (one set). The impression is very positive. This set, in my moderate driving, passed about 120 thousand km (winter mileage excluded, as it's a winter tire set). I note that up to 100 thousand km the tread looked quite decent, but for the last 20 thousand km the pattern noticeably started to fade, feeling as though the upper layer was significantly more durable under wear. I
- Vehicle:
- Honda Civic 1,5L 1995-2001
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
An excellent choice for summer on any road
it goes perfectly on asphalt, doesn't make noise at high speed, doesn't squeal even in sharp turns, it's not very suitable for off-road, but it behaves quite well if you don't go into the rough.
Pros: moderately soft- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
The reason for purchasing this tire was to improve its off-road capability while still being able to drive on pavement. I specifically chose an all-terrain tire. In the end, I chose this tire based on its price and test results. Now, I'd like to share my personal impressions, which I will compare to a clean all-season tire that I used to have..
1. The fuel consumption on asphalt increased by 1 liter (plus or minus 0.2 liters depending on the
- Vehicle:
- Nissan X-Trail
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Overall, I liked the tire, it's stiff enough to provide good handling, not noisy, and in the rain, I tried it at 160 km/h - it held perfectly, at 120 km/h I drove into a puddle about 10 meters long, it was slightly pulled, but it kept the road until the end, I can say there was no aquaplaning. On wet pavement, it brakes quite a distance, but there were no dangerous or unpredictable moments. On dry
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Funcargo 1,3L 2000-2005
- Control on a dry road
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I'm driving and I'm not complaining
As for an economy class tire, it's quite good, I've driven 2 seasons, I think it will be enough for the future without any problems. On dry roads, it handles perfectly, on wet roads, everything is predictable and understandable, I didn't drive in mud much, although I had to drive on dirt roads, I didn't get stuck even once. In general, you can drive, at least that's what I think!
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Excellent tires, buying my second set! I drove the first set for 67,000 km. I only changed them because I wasn't keeping an eye on the camber (one side wore off on the rear wheels), and I could've safely driven another 20K on the front. Great tire for city and off-road driving.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Pathfinder
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability