Tyre reviews Yokohama Geolandar A/T-S G012. Page 17 792

Treadwell satisfied. Average performance.

Dirt roads, gravel, snow and black ice. 70% asphalt, 30% dirt road, potholes.

Meets the manufacturer's specified characteristics without exception.

Great tires for summer. Do not use in winter.

We got Dad such a thing for his Opel Frontera. It's not too loud, has great off-road capabilities for fishing trips, and basically, you can even drive it in winter.

After a friend's recommendation, I purchased this "product" of the Japanese tire industry. The choice was between this and a Goodyear from Turkey, which was 200 rubles cheaper per tire, but that's not the main point, compared to the sensations I will describe below. The previous Kumho PowerStar from Korea was a good tire, with 67000 km on it, 175/65-14. The first thing that struck me after the installation, as if four pillars

I bought new tires yesterday. Still getting used to them. The Bridgestone Turanza was on my old car, but I like Yokohama better - it's softer and quieter. I'll check other specs and update later.

Money down the drain
The tires are simply terrible: they brake horribly, lose traction very early and after that they slide like on oil, on wet surfaces they slide like on ice. With this tire you will understand what aquaplaning is.
Pros: Strong sidewall
Cons: Awful grip qualities

Money down the drain

In general, the tire holds well on both dry and wet asphalt, but on sandy asphalt it immediately goes into wear, when accelerating it somehow "bounces", over the season I've already replaced all the tires, on a "good" pothole at speed I've already punctured the fourth wheel (the tire cannot be restored), for this money it's better to take something better right away, rather than constantly replacing.

Good tires
The rubber is super in the rain, the car is like stuck on turns, doesn't skid on dry roads, super
Pros: no drawbacks found