Tyre reviews Nokian Rotiiva A/T. Page 7 123

All good except aquaplaning, it's not there. It's really bad in the wet, not controllable. Rest is good.

Multi-season budget tyres

Primary drive - soil-gravel, sand, asphalt. I liked them.

I've been using this 265/65R17 tyre for 5 years, running it 24/7. The mileage is 37t/km. I drive on all-wheel drive from April to October, and on a full-time 4x4 from October to April. The front tyres have 20% wear, while the rear have 40% (I have a special wear indicator on a test track). On dry roads, I have no complaints whatsoever, either on wet roads.

Everything is fine!!!

I replaced my Yokohama A/Ts with these tires. They are quieter, the car feels softer, and at 3000km, there is no wear visible, despite frequent driving on twisties at reasonable speeds. The main thing is to keep an eye on tire pressure. They behave well in cold temperatures. I haven't tested them in the snow yet. I will write a follow-up soon. The only drawback is that they came out of balance during balancing. I had to add up

I haven't gone off-road or driven in snow with them. Only used them in the summer. Quiet, comfortable, and balanced well. Found it easy to rebalance. Overall, I'm happy with the tire.

The tyres have covered more than 100,000 kilometres and such durability has not been seen before.

Soft and quiet. Good traction on various road surfaces (including wet), does not hydroplane upon entering a puddle at moderate speed. No drawbacks detected.