Tyre reviews Кама 218. Page 6 119

I evaluated them for their durability and good handling. The Gazelle moves on daily orders, you can say, without considering the roads. Over the 3 years, it has driven on all kinds of roads, and all the tires are intact and undamaged. The tires have good traction, and you can move controllably in any weather. And, of course, an important point is the price, at the time it was satisfactory and was better than the alternatives considered.

Quiet, for Lada cars soft enough, but just enough, could have been much better. In some places, it hits the steering wheel on potholes. Otherwise, there's nothing to complain about. The main characteristics of the tire are at an acceptable level and that's the most important thing for this price.

When I bought it, I thought it would wear out much faster, it's almost 90, the last 20 thousand was really interesting how much it could still go. I hit it against stones and curbs, not on purpose, of course, but it happened. I bent the discs several times, and nothing happened to it.

I don't agree that the tire is hard, it's quite soft. Can be called an all-season tire, if you're not taking risks in the winter.

Mileage 80,000, of which 30% with overload, wear is already under 90%. In terms of price-quality, it is acceptable, I will buy again.

I have been using them on a regular basis since 2013. The only break was in 2018, for about half a year, when I switched to others, and as you can understand from the timeframe, they did not last long in the same conditions. After that, I decided not to experiment and went back to Kama. The tire is generally likable.

Uneven tread wear, translates to 15000-2000 kg, the inner part of the rim is worn out after 20 thousand, I've already replaced two rear wheels, the season doesn't go 100%

Standing on a 4x4 tire, works great.

I replaced 6 out of 6 tires within the year.

Tires fully meet the criteria, price-quality.