Tyre reviews Кама 218. Page 2 100
- Rate
I'm taking it for the second time, previously I had experience with it on a company car and NOT ONCE has anything unexpected happened with it. It withstands everything within reasonable limits and a bit beyond. Well, that is, curbs-potholes, any road, with asphalt and without, heat-cold, everything is fine. Good sidewalls, the tread wears out slowly.
- Vehicle:
- ГАЗ Gazelle City
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Not expensive for a set for GAZelle, but already 2 seasons of quality driving with good handling. Drains water and slush, goes into snow. Mileage of approximately 45,000, condition is good.
- Vehicle:
- ГАЗ Gazelle City
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Acceptable absolutely for its price. Quite soft, wear-resistant, suitable for year-round use.
- Vehicle:
- Peugeot Boxer
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Fake review
- Rate
I have a Kama 218. The tires, if compared to big brands, last about a third less, for example, when talking about Continental, but the price was three times cheaper. Handling doesn't suffer much, I don't drive fast, mostly in the city and suburbs. So, for me, Kama is a good deal.
- Vehicle:
- Peugeot Boxer
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Fake review
- Rate
I've driven on different tires and the impressions from these have been more positive than from most others. I drive within the permitted speed limits and do not abuse overloading.
- Vehicle:
- Iveco Daily
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I stand on the Niva all year round, you can rely on it. In winter, it doesn't freeze, I load the Niva with full cargo, it withstands all the hardships. Approaching the mileage of 80,000 km, soon it's time to change. I will take another one like it. The durability, quality of production, suit me. The only thing I think is a long braking distance on it.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 21214 1.7L 1994-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Blew two tires in the spring, hit a pit, messed up the entire right side. Replaced the rear right one with a spare, and for the front one, I decided to try the Camac 218. Have already driven a couple dozen thousand kilometers, will be re-tiring completely.
- Vehicle:
- ГАЗ Gazelle City
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Fake review
- Rate
I got these tires with the car, almost new. I drove for two seasons. Everything is relative, of course, but for their price, these tires are quite decent. The ride is adequate, not very noisy.
- Vehicle:
- Iveco Daily
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Purchased in a hurry that year. Turns out to be of normal quality and in terms of driving characteristics, it's okay. Contacts the road, enters and exits turns as needed, without understeer. No strong tilt. Withstands weight load. There is some noise at high speed, but otherwise, it's fine, and the tires are durable.
- Vehicle:
- Audi A2
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Fake review
- Rate
The tire seems to be durable and wear-resistant, with 20 tons of mileage so far. I'm judging by this. I didn't take it before, but now I had to lower my priorities. But so far, I don't think I've made a mistake.
- Vehicle:
- ГАЗ Gazelle
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability