Tyre reviews Hankook W409 Winter i Pike. Page 6 279
- Rate
Good tires.
Hankook I Pike tires can be characterized with one word - GOOD. I've been using them for the second season, and over one season, I lost 2 studs on each of the 2 front tires (I only saw snow in February, in winter). My driving style is active. Handling is good in all modes, but the most enjoyable thing is driving on snowy slush when there's a thick layer of thawed snow on the asphalt. The only thing
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Almost NOKIAN
Previously drove on premium segment tires (Nokian, Goodyear, Michelin) Hankook is my first experiment in the middle class. Last year, the worn-out Nokian H4 Finnish tires fell apart in one season - 20 thousand km. Hankook so far shows good wear resistance, as for the quality requirements - on top. I'm satisfied. Recommendations - buy.
Pros: passability, noise, price/quality ratio- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Excellent quality at a low price
I've been driving since 10/01/09, mainly in Moscow, sometimes in the suburbs. My driving style is aggressive. The mileage is around 5,000 km. The studs are still all in place. I will definitely buy them again. Previously, I had Nokian Hakka 4. It was more expensive, but it was much worse on snow and mud.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Excellent tires at an excellent price
Excellent tires, I bought them by chance in a wheel - I was going for Yokohama but there were only 3 wheels left :))) I've never regretted taking them - on St. Petersburg roads, they're perfect both on dry roads at minus temperatures and when it's slushy at plus temperatures. The noise level is not high, and after 5000 km, there's no noticeable wear.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Quite good tires for our roads
I installed these tires on my Skoda Fabia New in size 185/60 on a 15-inch radius instead of the standard 195/55, and so far I'm satisfied. The passability is normal both on mud and on ice, and they brake well at any reasonable winter speeds. There are no complaints on a cleared highway either - the noise from the studs is almost imperceptible, rather than noise, it's some kind of rust
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
The level of "Rosava"
Here they wrote about 27,000 and 100,000 km of mileage without visible wear!!!!?? What kind of tire is this made of? What kind of normal tire is this? "Rosava" does it at this level. Ugh!!! 29-03-2009
- Rate
Hankook Winter I Pike W409 225/60 R 17
I encountered it quite by chance. BUT I don't regret it!Very good tires!Justifies its cost at 5+. I drive a Nissan X-trail T31. Last winter, I didn't lose a single stud with an active driving style. I want to note that this is the first time I didn't have to switch to a more relaxed driving style with the onset of winter. The tire handles
- Rate
- Rate
Hankook W 409 i PIKE
I had not previously encountered the Hankook brand and my personal opinion is that it would have been better if it had stayed that way!!!! On dry roads, everything is fine, but after rain, it's impossible to brake((( the car skids, the braking distance has increased by half(( and this is not even winter, I wonder what it will be like on snow???
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Rate
- Rate
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price/performance
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Garbage, not a tire, after 2 seasons all the studs flew out, bought in the size 205/55 R16, the most important thing is that the tread is fully alive, didn't slip. Before that there was a Kamaz, it wore out in 4 years, but the studs were all intact.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Golf V
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good winter tires, drove all winter, city and highway driving once a week, didn't notice any significant difference with the more expensive tires I had on my previous car. Stopped a bit faster with the previous ones, but they were more expensive. Had to brake sharply on ice only a couple of times, of course, didn't stop right away. Can be driven without aggressive driving and racing. Maybe I incorrectly specified the tire model.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Qashqai
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability