Tyre reviews Hankook RA33 Dynapro HP2 204

The main plus of these tires is their colossal wear resistance! I'm speaking for myself, compared to my old Michelin Energy, Nokian Hakka this tire model can be washed and resold as new at around 2000 km after purchasing! These tires are completely "durable" in a good sense! The ride in the city on potholes, cracks, railroad crossings, sidewalks, gravel, studs, and asphalt repair didn't leave any marks, bulges, cuts, or

I'll start my review by telling you that I used to have bald tires on my car, and it was already getting to the point where I was thinking about replacing them with new ones by winter. I spent a lot of time googling, reading, and asking questions, but I couldn't come to any conclusion about which tire is better. I spent a lot of time thinking about what kind of tire I need for my SUV, with a tractor-like tread or a regular highway tire. Since I

It's interesting to wonder why such a divergence of opinions about "Noise", may it be due to the fact that the "metal" itself plays a significant role. Has anyone managed to reach at least 60,000 km with these tires, or is this just a fairy tale for today's tyre manufacturers.

Honda CR-V III, tire size 225/65/17. Bought in replacement of the original Michelin Latitude Tour HP tires which honestly lasted 70,000 km. Quality is excellent for the price, firmer than Michelin, handling at the level, almost no noise. Came a few times into decent potholes, all tires are intact! In general, high-quality tires with good wear resistance, will perfectly fit both asphalt and dirt roads.

A great tire for the price. I've been deliberating for a while, but I've been satisfied with my choice, especially in the summer weather - holds the road well in any conditions, didn't get to test it in the winter - I do have a winter set, no noticeable wear so far. The only downside is that it does pick up pebbles between the protectors, but that's not the end of the world.

I spent a long time choosing tyres. Previously, I had the Michelin Latitude Tour HP, so I was looking for something that was cheaper, but not worse. I use 80% of the time on highways and 20% of the time on light off-road. The tyres are quiet, do not kick into the knees, and there is no aquaplaning until 90-95 degrees, hold the road up to 140, I have not driven faster. Excellent resistance to wear

I purchased these tires in June 2015, right before a trip to Abkhazia. During the vacation I drove 6000 km on various roads (dry highway, wet highway, mountain roads, serpentine). I got an absolute satisfaction from the purchase. Tires are comfortable to drive, low noise level. I did not test on a winter road as why to buy winter tires Hakkapeliitta 8 if not to use them?!

Used in summer conditions (early July 2015). Mostly urban driving mode. Acceleration-deceleration and handling on asphalt surface in all stages of wear is good. Also good handling on wet asphalt in rain. During a trip around Lake Ladoga around 100km of gravel roads were covered. Handling on gravel is good (speed range 40-80 km/h).

I brought the car back from the US in 2014, the original tire had 32,000 km on it, it's now 20 years old, and I'm still on the original tire, decided to make it to the end of the summer season, the tread is still 4-5 mm, the tire has 90,000 km on it, I've driven on gravel and dirt to the dacha for about 30% of the mileage. In a word, a

Prior to this, I had Michelin Latitude Cross tyres, and I'll be comparing them. If I were to compare them to shoes, Michelin is similar to hiking boots - rigid, confident on any road - asphalt, gravel, dirt - doesn't matter, fairly noisy compared to Hankook, but durable. Hankook reminded me of sneakers: softer, lighter, more comfortable on any surface, but not ideal for going off-road into the mud and rough terrain. We mostly have dirt roads and