Tyre reviews Hankook K127 Ventus S1 Evo3 78

Tires were installed on Genesis, before that Michelin Pilot Sport 3 were installed, but due to well-known events, prices soared, and it's also difficult to find a set of different widths in the right size. Hankook tires have shown themselves at a decent level, maybe with a slightly higher wear rate compared to Michelin. The price/quality ratio is at a good level

A great tire, switched from Michelin PS4 for the sake of economy. Soft, excellent grip both when accelerating and when passing high-speed turns. Stable and comfortable at high speeds (haven't driven over 250km/h yet, but I think it won't be a problem for the tire).
In the rain, everything is fine.
From the notes: a bit more sensitive to rutting than Michelin PS4 and Continental Sportcontact 5.
But the main thing is that it's 2 times cheaper than Michelin.

I'm driving a Mazda 6 2021 model. Before these tires, I had the original Bridgestone tires with a width of 225, they were noisy and rough, and the car was thrown into the ruts. I took the Hankook tires with a width of 235, all the drawbacks disappeared, I'm happy with the purchase, I recommend. At a speed of 220 km/h, they hold the road perfectly, and there was no aquaplaning on puddles.

Advantages - drives well. Price. Does not fishtail at high speeds (accelerated to 220 km/h). Bought a set of different widths for 70 thousand. Two of them are 275/40-19 (delivered at the end of 23-year production). Noisy at all speed ranges, I hoped that ......

In principle, I recommend it for the price and all parameters! I have driven only 750 km on it so far, with a temperature range of +2 to +10 degrees, maybe it will be less noisy in the heat (it was one of the important parameters for me when choosing). I will add later

Hello everyone. I've been looking for tires for a long time because prices are biting hard these days. I used to always buy Michelin and didn't bother, but now it's hard to afford. I studied all the options and came to the conclusion that I need to take this set and check in practice how good they are. The result was a big surprise.

On the highway, it holds 230 perfectly. I didn't notice any aquaplaning at a speed of 120. It brakes well in both dry and wet weather. I've already driven 9,000 kilometers. The wear is still normal. I spent two times less than I would have spent on Michelin. At the time of purchase, Michelin cost 32 rubles per tire. I bought these for 12,500 rubles. My size is 235 45 18. My friend has them on his Audi A7, but they didn't work out for him. Maybe they behave differently on different sizes, but in my size, everything is fine.

After tires from various manufacturers with run-flat technology, finally put ordinary ones... driving style hasn't changed:) but these are much more comfortable, hold well, are quiet, and the priceee. (1 set of run-flat = 3 sets of Hankook:)

The tires are excellent: at speed, in corners, on dry and wet surfaces - everywhere you feel stable behavior. The only remark is the noise level (maybe due to the size of r20 295/35 and 255/40)

Moderately stiff, very grippy in corners, can be a bit noisier than desired but overall what's needed for dynamic driving of a heavy and powerful car

A very comfortable tire, despite the size of 255/35R20 and 285/30R20, it's not stiff and not noisy, it holds the road very confidently, doesn't wander in the lane, at a speed of 250 km/h, excellent directional stability and not noisy. A good alternative to Michelin, which has become too expensive, but not so good to justify the difference in price x2.

A very successful tread, both in the heat and in the rain, it holds the road perfectly. It is noisy due to the large lamellas, but not critically.