Tyre reviews Hankook K120 Ventus V12 Evo2 286

Tread size: 225/45 ZR17
Compared to the DUNLOP SP Sport 01 and SP SPORT MAXX TT.
Handling and steering: Dunlop is clearly better, grippy and precise, smooth cornering at any speed. Hankook are soft, grip at the limit and then slip. If I entered certain corners (e.g. the ring road on a track) at 100-120 km/h on Dunlop, I

17" Audi 8V0601025 (17x7.5 5x112 ET51)
Hankook K120 Ventus V12 Evo2 225/45 R17 94Y XL
Net weight: 20,880 kg.
Last summer the Chinese Alcasta 16" were on, with Hankook K110 rubber.
April. +2 to +5 degrees Celsius. The first kilometers on only recently thawed

Hello. The tire is behaving perfectly. I bought them with the knowledge that I will be driving fast, making sharp turns and bad weather conditions. The tire has performed as expected. Price and quality 100%! I bought 225/40/18 and drove in Volgograd, the roads are terrible. No punctures after hitting potholes the size of a well, when I first got out of the car I thought I'd go and buy new tires, but it wasn't necessary.

I'm writing this review about the size 215/50 R17 95W XL.
Over a season, I have driven approximately 16,000 km on this tire in normal driving conditions: 85% highway/15% city, maximum speed of 160 km/h. I'm a pensioner and drive in a relaxed style. Compared to the standard Bridgestone Turanza, I would give Hankook 10/10.
Handling on various

I bought Hankook K120 Ventus V12 Evo2 205/55 R16 94W XL.
What were my selection criteria?
1. Good Euro ratings (braking on wet not below B, noise not above 71 dB, rolling resistance not that important).
2. Good American ratings (wear not below 300, handling not below A, temperature stability not that important).
3. Speed index not below H (210

I spent a long time finding a suitable replacement for the original Continental SportContact tyres that were chewed up at 35,000 km (I've never had worse tyres!). I finally settled on the Vredestein Centro HP2 as the perfect price/quality ratio for 19" low-profile SUV tyres. The tyres grip the heavy and unstable car firmly, even in high-speed turns with braking (that's when "our turn... was!!!" , 130 km/h, brake pedal to

I bought these tires for my 2009 Ford Focus 2 after its mid-life facelift in place of the originals, with a size of 215/50 R17. At the time of writing this review, the Hankook tires have covered around 25,000 km on the roads of our vast Motherland. We've driven a couple of times from Arkhangelsk to Crimea, with some deviations along the Crimean Peninsula. In general, the tires are quite good. They

Bought the set in spring 2015. Ran a season with them.
+Low noise level
+Excellent aquaplaning resistance
+Good handling on dry and wet asphalt
-Rolling resistance

3 years with this car. 235/50 r18. I had Continental 5 and winter, Nokian Hakka R tires in the same size. To my surprise, I always got accustomed to the noise of the tire after retreading from winter to Continental summer tires. Continental seemed noisier than the sticker, but slightly softer than the Hakka, likely because the winter tire was an XL index, designed for crossovers. I bought a new Hankook set, Continental was

I spent a long time selecting summer tires in the 205/50 R17 size. I was choosing between Pirelli P7 Blue and the current model, but I decided on Hankook tires because they are described as being stronger (more robust sidewalls). They fit perfectly on my original wheels and don't bulge out. Comparing them to the previous tires is pointless because I practically wore them out, but the new Hankook tires are much quieter. On wet pavement, they handle confidently