Tyre reviews Hankook K117 Ventus S1 Evo2. Page 4 215
- Rate
Tires were great. The only thing is, at most 3 seasons, and that's with little mileage and no vacation time. Otherwise, you should count on 2 seasons.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Touareg
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought 17-inch Camry wheels for my 180th Corolla and needed to buy tires that wouldn't compromise comfort compared to 16-inch wheels. The tires were a hit, soft, large water drainage channels and most importantly, not noisy. It handled well on gravel and balanced perfectly with added 1-2 weights.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Corolla
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Until this tire, I had a worn-out Continental tire so a comparison was made with it. The Hankook tire surprisingly turned out to be no worse at all! And the price is significantly cheaper. What surprised me the most is the hold on the asphalt, both on dry and on wet. I jump into any turns, in the salon everything is flying around and there's no hint of a tire blowout, and that's both in the rain and in other conditions. And this is despite the
- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Orlando
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Just started running the second season. Winter is also a Hankook, already five seasons, and probably a couple more will suffice - soft, comfortable, in a word, just a delight. That's why I decided to take this from the same manufacturer last summer. Previously, I had the Nokian Hakka Green, but its sidewalls are too weak. I studied, read, watched, and in the end, I took the Ventus. They hold up well. The car is heavy
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai i40
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Road holding is good. Not very noisy. Balances normally. No disc protectors. Rear tyres 315/35/20 worn down to tread by 23,000 km under slow city driving.
- Vehicle:
- BMW X5 (E70)
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good tire with no obvious drawbacks. Lasted 3 seasons perfectly, 4th season is already heavily worn out, also served well. Holds up well on the roads of Ryazan (from roads with one name) to all the challenges and difficulties.
- Vehicle:
- Honda Civic 5d
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
After all the different Michelins and Pirellis, this is the best tire!
- Vehicle:
- BMW X3 (F25)
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Excellent tires for the price and quality. I've covered 3000 km so far on the Big Sochi and everything is fine - they handle well on dry and wet asphalt. They hold the car at high speeds and I feel confident driving on winding roads. So they are perfect for my C4 VTS with a 17 inch diameter.
- Vehicle:
- Citroen C4
- Size:
- 205/50 R17 93Y XL
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Сочи
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Hard to compare to anything. Used ContiSportContact 3 before. They felt a bit more grippy and stable.
But, for the price, Hankook's not bad. Many write about massive wear, but if you drive carefully and stay on the ball, the set should last 4 seasons exactly.
- Vehicle:
- Volvo S60
- Size:
- 235/45 R17 97Y XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
I drive carefully, adhering to speed limits and road safety, and in this mode, the tyres behave normally.
The price does not please me! :)- Vehicle:
- Renault Megane
- Size:
- 205/55 R17 91W
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability