Tyre reviews Hankook K117 Ventus S1 Evo2. Page 3 215

Fast ride tires. Good straight-line stability at high speed. Aquaplaning resistance, at least as long as the tread pattern is good. Holds the car well on wet asphalt.

I bought them instead of Continentals. I will never buy this German nonsense again ((( Hankook is an excellent tire. It handles great on water and doesn't overheat in contrast to the Conti. The only minus is it's noisy after 140 km.

On front axle 180 hp clutch on dry pavement! On wet was pleasantly surprised, too great! Got the impression that the previous Continental held worse, and cost 50% more.
Speed 200+ hold confidently, do not oscillate.
Think it's not worth overpaying for other brands. Price-quality on top!
Excellent tires, I would recommend to everyone!!!!

High traction on both dry and wet surfaces
Precise response to steering wheel turns
Good resistance to aquaplaning
Effective braking

I purchased these tires due to the wear of the "native" ones.

In general, they are not bad tires. Apparently, due to the fact that the rubber is very soft, I only used them for two summer seasons. This, perhaps, is the only negative point.

235/45 17. Ran for 2 seasons. City - highway. Driving style is calm and confident. Tires are good, soft. In the fall at the end of the second season, when replacing with winter tires at the tire service, several bulges were shown on 3 tires and the tread was "due for replacement".

I can admit, these are one of the best tires for my heavy (2.3t) crossover, on which it passes turns very grippingly at speeds of up to 120 km/h and does not deviate from the trajectory. Aquaplaning is normal, the noise is excellent, although the car's sound insulation is also good. They are comfortable, after soft winter tires, these are no worse. Among the drawbacks - on a dirty dirt road, they quickly become clogged with mud, but this was expected, since I bought the tires for the highway/city. I'm satisfied, I recommend.

Size 245*45 R19

Among the advantages: a decent appearance, very well holds the car on a wet road, handles well, low noise level, does not collect pebbles in the tread.

Among the disadvantages: width!!! with declared 245mm, actual 225mm!, saving on the amount of material (rubber), there was no such thing on the old DUNLOP, visually looked much wider with the same sizes on the marking.. small wheel protection, it's almost non-existent, very wide longitudinal grooves, most likely again due to savings on material.

Summary: good tires with good characteristics for an adequate price, let's see how long they last, if I had known about the width, I would have taken a wider one.

I used to have a 13-year-old Accord, and according to the passport, it should have 225/50 tires, but I took a 55, and it fit perfectly, with a slightly higher profile. Turns are not very comfortable, but potholes and curbs no longer cause serious concern. Quiet. Overall, the tire is great for a peaceful ride, quite reliable, and well-balanced. In general, it's a middle-of-the-road tire, worth the money.

Great tire. Brought it with reinforced sidewall. Holds the road well. The stiffness is justified, no bulges, although I got into deep potholes a few times. I'd recommend getting the reinforced one if you have a low profile.