Tyre reviews Sailun Atrezzo Elite. Page 19 8905
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Tires are comfortable, quiet. They don't become hard like, for example, Bridgestone at +5, +10 degrees. However, fuel consumption has increased by half a liter per hundred kilometers. Maybe they will still run in. Tires are grippy, soft, I liked them. But the main drawback is the manufacturing or storage process. Only one tire was perfectly balanced, the other three had to be disassembled, rotated on the rim, and adjusted to find the best balance point. In the end, it's OK.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota RAV4
- Size:
- 225/60 R18 104W XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Stariy Oskol
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
After Nokian Nordman SX2, I was pleased with the silence in the car's cabin. In normal driving modes, everything is fine. At speeds of up to 140 km/h, there are also no problems (I don't drive faster). And the price is much more humane than what they ask for European tires. Unfortunately, our manufacturers are lagging behind the Chinese ones.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Focus
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
In terms of price/quality ratio, it seemed to me - "worth taking". They were well balanced. On the highway, I didn't try over 150 km/h - up to these speeds, it stands confidently. In turns, it holds well, within the limits of "civilian" driving. I mostly drive in the city, the tread is good (2.5 atm), and acoustic comfort is moderate.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Golf V Plus
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Excellent tires. I didn't expect this from the Chinese. Soft, quiet. Good tread. Brake well. Puddles, dry asphalt - everything is fine. Mostly highway mileage. I'm satisfied.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Avensis
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 94V XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Пенза
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
At this mileage, it has proven itself on the positive side. It is almost noiseless, on a wet road and in the rain, it holds the road perfectly. It does not concede to world brands.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Grand Scenic
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 94V XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Мончегорск
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Very good tires. They clearly hold the road, both wet and dry, as well as on turns. Braking is good on different surfaces. Not noisy.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Jetta
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Non-unambiguous tire. Purchased at MastaVtoShina in November 2022. The tire itself is from 2021. The tire mileage at the time of writing the review is 6000 km. Previously, I had Michelin Energy Saver 215 55 16 tires, excellent tires that covered around 80,000 km and still had some tread left. The only thing was that they became quite noisy towards the end. I don't understand why Sailun is rated better than Michelin Energy. So, the positives of Sailun can be attributed to its softness, low noise, and price - that's all. Maybe I got defective tires, I don't know. The car handling is terrible. The car is constantly being pulled to the left or right relative to the road slope. As soon as I put them on, the car constantly shifted to the right, even with the steering wheel straight. After swapping the front wheels from right to left, the car started shifting to the left. Then I swapped the rear wheels to the front, and the car drove straight, if you can call it that. Also, there is no clear connection between the wheel and the steering wheel. There is no clear zero point on the steering wheel. I constantly have to make micro-corrections on the highway, as the car floats. I tried different tire pressures from 2 to 2.5 atmospheres, but it made no difference. The conclusion is: either I got curved tires and the quality of Chinese products is not consistent, or people writing reviews are being dishonest. Why did I buy it? Firstly, I drove on Sailun WST1 winter tires for 9 years, and I had no complaints about them - very decent tires. And secondly, I read reviews and was swayed by them.
- Vehicle:
- Peugeot 408
- Buy again?:
- Absolutely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Size 195/60 R15 installed instead of Pirelli P1. Immediately noticeable is the directional stability, I won't say it's terrible, but Pirelli was more confident. The feeling is that it slightly floats on the soft sidewall. In all other respects, the tires are completely satisfactory, considering their price, I would recommend them.
- Vehicle:
- Lada Vesta
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
3 wheels were balanced well, only 1 wheel required 35 grams. The ride is quiet, much quieter than the GOOD YEAR Outlander. Braking on both dry and especially wet roads was impressive, they perform great. The sidewall is soft, and it's necessary to be careful when driving on rough terrain with sharp rocks. Overall, the impression is 4+. Yes, I drove on GOOD YEAR for 4 seasons, approximately 45-50 thousand kilometers. How long these will last is a question.
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Kodiaq
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought a set of tires in March 2020 for 9016 rubles (2254 rubles per piece). The size is 185/65/r15. I continue to drive on them now, and I'm satisfied with the tires.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Fusion
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability