Tyre reviews Landsail Ice Star IS37 362

Since there's no way to edit my review, I'll try to write another one that's more informative if it gets approved. The rating of characteristics is also subject to adjustment.

By the way, the rating of characteristics is just nonsense. Who came up with this? And why isn't it possible to rate only the characteristics that I was able to determine? For example, wear resistance - I sold this tire after a month of driving, and it's impossible to determine this parameter over such a short period, or other characteristics that I couldn't rate. Another example is resistance to aquaplaning.

But the respected site developers, despite everything, force you to put in fictional ratings.

Before buying this tire, as usual, I googled it, read reviews, saw a not-bad rating, and didn't pay much attention to reviews about directional stability... well, well. How I regretted it later.

Multivan 2007.

All the advantages of this tire, the price - are nullified by the directional stability and handling during driving, especially during overtaking. And the higher the speed, the stronger the handling.

I did the tire mounting right here, at Mosavtoshina. The pressure was pumped up as indicated on the front door, based on the maximum loading of the Multivan. Having driven out onto the MKAD, even before reaching home, I got upset and realized that I had made another purchase mistake.

The previous tires, Nokian Tyres Hakka C, which I used to drive on - the tread is already worn out, but good old tires are better than such new ones like the Landsail Ice Star IS37.

Speed up to 80 km/h is still okay and tolerable.

Above 80 km/h (increasingly) is just awful, you literally have to catch the car.

Although for city driving, it's still possible to tolerate, but for intercity driving + dynamic driving, it's definitely not. It's simply dangerous, and you have to exert more effort. The adrenaline rush at high speed is guaranteed with these tires, and the exclamations ("WOW, what a pirouette, stand still, stand still, stand still") - that's roughly what I was saying while driving on the MKAD)). I mostly drive dynamically and often change lanes when the cars in front are slow.

Maybe I would have gotten used to it, but I needed to drive from Moscow to Samara, so I removed them after a month, put them up for sale, and bought another one, also from China, but that's a different story))).

Although no, I wouldn't have gotten used to it. That's just what I was telling myself to comfort myself.

Multivan is, of course, long and heavy, not a sedan (although I read positive reviews of other car models and sizes), but from this experience, I drew the conclusion that I will never return to this brand, even for a sedan. I consider this tire the worst in my 25 years of driving experience.

The sidewalls feel very soft (like cotton) to the touch, compared to the Nokian Tyres Hakka C.

Balanced without any issues. Noise level within normal limits. Tread pattern still looks good. A decent tire for the price, a reliable mid-range option. Just remember that no tire, regardless of price, can guarantee 100% safety if you don't have your head on your shoulders. Michelin might be better, but not by as much as it's more expensive.

Tire blew out on the right side of my Hakkapeliitta 5. Didn't find anything decent at the second-hand shop to get me through the season. As it happens, the unforeseen expenses always come at the right time, so I bought this product from above and I wasn't sorry about it.

Hakka is a lot quieter, tire noise doesn't bother me. The road grip is excellent, there's no wobbling within the lane. It feels somewhat soft,

The tires were given as a gift when I bought a car at a car dealership. I had never heard of the Landsail brand before, and I've always been skeptical of Chinese tires. But, as they say, don't look a gift horse in the mouth. There was no choice, only this particular model of tires was available.

Before, I only drove on expensive tires. For the past eight years, I've only had Nokian studded tires of different models, and I have a lot of respect for this brand. In between, I've had Kymho and Bridgestone. It turns out that I'm a connoisseur of tires. And here, I was given some Chinese brand.

Let's get to the point. I've driven 500 km on these tires so far, and since it's still the break-in period, I've been driving smoothly without any sharp movements. So far, I haven't experienced any discomfort. The tires have proven to be quite reliable. I've driven on black ice in the mornings before the roads were cleared, and I've driven through a strong snowstorm on the highway. I've also tested them on loose snow outside the city, and they handle it great. And on asphalt, well, it's probably like with all tires. Currently, it's -18 degrees Celsius outside, and they haven't turned into plastic. In short, I'm generally satisfied with the tires so far. It's too early to talk about the stud retention, we'll see about that later. But there are really few studs on the tire. All modern studded tires have a much larger number of studs. On the other hand, the acoustic comfort is fine. And the price is also very affordable. That's my observation after almost a month of driving.

Not any worse than the high-end brands, particularly Bridgestone 7000 and Kumho KW22. Up to -25, it's pretty good, but after that it gets quite harsh until you deflate it. Relatively quiet and balanced, with a maximum of 40 grams on the wheel.

Installed on the car...balanced well, the tire fitters said...holds the road normally...very quiet...for this money, an excellent option

I bought this tire model to replace my worn-out PIRELLI. I didn't feel any difference, whether I was driving on PIRELLI or now on Landsail. I bought a set of different widths with a 20-inch radius. For this price, this tire is simply excellent.

Not noisy compared to its analogs, possibly due to the difference in the number of studs. From the salon, the noise from the studs is slightly audible. Easily cleaned of sticky snow. Most of all, I like the behavior on rolled snow, you understand that the studs solve the braking. On all-wheel drive when entering a sharp turn with a little gas, it does not skid. The main thing is not to press the gas too hard, on icy asphalt, the grip will be worse. On loose snow, it rides briskly, does not get stuck. In general, I am very satisfied with the tires, especially for their price at a size of 215/70/R16!

The tire has exceeded my expectations. The lads at the tyre shop said it was perfectly balanced, with one wheel at 40 grams and the rest at 15-25 grams. The ride is quite comfortable, it handles snow well, and on ice it holds the vehicle normally, if not too aggressively. On the highway, it performs well at both 129 km/h and 149 km/h, the vehicle handles nicely and the noise level is not an issue. For the price, it is

Tires. Good. Even unexpectedly good for such a price.
After 10000 km all studs are in place.
Doesn't slip. Doesn't skid on the road.
No noise heard.
Before this was a highly acclaimed Nokia Hakkapeliitta. These are better than a new one.
Compared to a new one I didn't know what to expect.)))))