Landsail Ice Star IS37

Since there's no way to edit my review, I'll try to write another one that's more informative if it gets approved. The rating of characteristics is also subject to adjustment.

By the way, the rating of characteristics is just nonsense. Who came up with this? And why isn't it possible to rate only the characteristics that I was able to determine? For example, wear resistance - I sold this tire after a month of driving, and it's impossible to determine this parameter over such a short period, or other characteristics that I couldn't rate. Another example is resistance to aquaplaning.

But the respected site developers, despite everything, force you to put in fictional ratings.

Before buying this tire, as usual, I googled it, read reviews, saw a not-bad rating, and didn't pay much attention to reviews about directional stability... well, well. How I regretted it later.

Multivan 2007.

All the advantages of this tire, the price - are nullified by the directional stability and handling during driving, especially during overtaking. And the higher the speed, the stronger the handling.

I did the tire mounting right here, at Mosavtoshina. The pressure was pumped up as indicated on the front door, based on the maximum loading of the Multivan. Having driven out onto the MKAD, even before reaching home, I got upset and realized that I had made another purchase mistake.

The previous tires, Nokian Tyres Hakka C, which I used to drive on - the tread is already worn out, but good old tires are better than such new ones like the Landsail Ice Star IS37.

Speed up to 80 km/h is still okay and tolerable.

Above 80 km/h (increasingly) is just awful, you literally have to catch the car.

Although for city driving, it's still possible to tolerate, but for intercity driving + dynamic driving, it's definitely not. It's simply dangerous, and you have to exert more effort. The adrenaline rush at high speed is guaranteed with these tires, and the exclamations ("WOW, what a pirouette, stand still, stand still, stand still") - that's roughly what I was saying while driving on the MKAD)). I mostly drive dynamically and often change lanes when the cars in front are slow.

Maybe I would have gotten used to it, but I needed to drive from Moscow to Samara, so I removed them after a month, put them up for sale, and bought another one, also from China, but that's a different story))).

Although no, I wouldn't have gotten used to it. That's just what I was telling myself to comfort myself.

Multivan is, of course, long and heavy, not a sedan (although I read positive reviews of other car models and sizes), but from this experience, I drew the conclusion that I will never return to this brand, even for a sedan. I consider this tire the worst in my 25 years of driving experience.

The sidewalls feel very soft (like cotton) to the touch, compared to the Nokian Tyres Hakka C.

Balanced without any issues. Noise level within normal limits. Tread pattern still looks good. A decent tire for the price, a reliable mid-range option. Just remember that no tire, regardless of price, can guarantee 100% safety if you don't have your head on your shoulders. Michelin might be better, but not by as much as it's more expensive.

Tire blew out on the right side of my Hakkapeliitta 5. Didn't find anything decent at the second-hand shop to get me through the season. As it happens, the unforeseen expenses always come at the right time, so I bought this product from above and I wasn't sorry about it.

Hakka is a lot quieter, tire noise doesn't bother me. The road grip is excellent, there's no wobbling within the lane. It feels somewhat soft,