Tyre reviews Hankook RT03 Dynapro MT. Page 3 136
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
I wanted to buy tires that could handle mud but also handle asphalt well. The tires have met my expectations, they move well in the mud, and they handle asphalt decently, the hum is not significant, they balanced out to zero, the Camry's stock tires could not be balanced without a vibration in the steering wheel.
- Vehicle:
- УАЗ Pickup
- Size:
- 245/75 R16C 120/116Q
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Only God is ideal, there is no universal tire yet, but a 245/75/16 Dinaplast MT RT 03 tire suits me just fine.
- Vehicle:
- Opel Monterey
- Size:
- 245/75 R16C 120/116Q
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Dear Friends! I have been using your services for over four years now. During this time, I purchased a set of winter tyres “Hankook” for my UAZ Patriot and I am very pleased with the quality of the tyres, as well as the promptness and professionalism of your employees! Good luck in your work, health and the promotion of new successful developments of companies producing such important products for us, car enthusiasts! Sincerely, Smirnov Boris Grigorievich, Ty
- Vehicle:
- УАЗ Patriot
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been using M+S tyres on my UAZ "Bukhanka" (not Hunter) since autumn 2015 mainly for hunting-fishing. Only positive impressions. The tyre is soft, doesn't get hard in frost (-35 degrees in January), comfortable and quiet on asphalt (compared to other M/T tyres). Excellent grip in snow and mud, no "slippage." Easy to drive on asphalt. High profile of 85% combined with narrow width of 235 is
- Vehicle:
- УАЗ Hunter
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Approximately 6,000 km passed. Wear is minimal. Noise is slight at low speeds. At speeds above 80 km/h, noise is lost in aerodynamic noise. At speed (up to 150) it behaves adequately. I drove a little bit through the mud, but where I used to get stuck on the standard Geolandar with full-time four-wheel drive, I now pass through with the rear axle drive engaged. I did not drive in winter and do not plan to -
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Pajero 3,0L 1991-1999
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Top-notch tire for the money! Had Continental highway tire before, handling was better, of course. This one is a bit rougher in turns, but you get used to it. Bought as an alternative to BFGoodrich AT - tried, compared... It's a beast in terms of traction - day and night! Where BFG (AT) has trouble, ETA doesn't even need a locker! Looks just as good, if not better, and more aggressive too. The only thing -
- Vehicle:
- Ford Explorer 4WD 4,0L 1991-1999
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Didn't get caught in the rain or snow (not snow country where I rarely get rain, but the mud is a must). The best tyres I've used on muddy ground, soft bulldust and corrugations forced me through a black soil bog where all the others (on A/T) failed.
- Vehicle:
- Land Rover Defender
- Size:
- 235/85 R16 N
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
I've been driving for two years, both in the summer and in the winter. In the winter, it’s obvious that it doesn't grip, although it does go on a snowy patch. In the summer, it's perfect, especially in the mud, which is understandable. On asphalt, it's mediocre, a bit less than the tread pattern. It's suitable for operation both on and off-road and on asphalt. Fuel consumption has increased compared to the standard, but I also chose a larger
- Vehicle:
- Kia Sportage 2,0L 1995-2004
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I drove on a UAZ Hunter with a 225/75/R16 tire size. It's hard to compare it to anything, since I previously only had a highway tire on the UAZ, and that's not a fair comparison. I haven't driven on Gudrich or other similar tires. On asphalt, it makes a noticeable noise, and with the windows open, it's quite audible. It's very stiff, and on broken asphalt, it's clear when it's uneven, and
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 21061 1.5L
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought these tires for fishing trips. As a result, I've been driving on them constantly without changing them since 2008. The operating conditions are 80% asphalt and 20% dirt and sand. On dirt roads, I deflate them to 0.8. On asphalt, they are not noisy, the handling is predictable, but they do hydroplane a bit in puddles and splash water onto the windshield. I'm not a speed demon, I don't drive over 110 km/h. On clay, they get clogged, but they float well in wet meadows. When stuck, they don't pull themselves out, so it's better to give them more RPM on dirt roads. They have excellent wear resistance. After 70,000 km, the tread depth is still 8 mm. Before buying, I thought for a long time about whether to choose AT or MT tires, but after 15 years of use, I don't regret my choice. At the time of writing this review, I'm thinking of switching to AT tires due to the increased mileage on asphalt.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi L200
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability