Tyre reviews Hankook K125 ventus prime 3. Page 13 333
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good tires for the money. Excellent aquaplaning resistance.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Ceed
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 91H
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Severodvinsk
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I don't even know how to say it gently, but my tires are 205/50 R16, and the price of the tire was 12,100 at the time of purchase. This tire is not even mid-range, and its price is around 5,000-6,000 at most. The tire is not bad, but not worth that kind of money. I bought it after reading reviews, and I wouldn't have considered it if not for the limited options in this size, with only three real options: Hankook, Bridge T005, and Toyo CF2. I've driven on the last two, and the Turanza is a bit stiff but good for wear and rolling, while the Toyo is balanced but a complete disaster on any surface except asphalt. I should have gotten the Bridgestone, but I wanted something softer, and that's what I got - a tire with uncertain handling on dry roads, horribly bad on wet roads, and it's not even significantly softer than the Bridgestone. Fuel consumption is somehow higher than on my winter Hakkapeliitta 8 with spikes, and the only thing that's on par is the noise level, as the tire is quiet. Overall, I won't be throwing it away, since it's better than some unknown Chinese square tire, but I wouldn't recommend buying it for that kind of money, as it's not worth it. (For the sake of objectivity, I gave it a 5 for ice and snow, and I'm afraid to imagine how it would behave on ice and snow, considering its performance on wet roads.)
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Polo
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I recently purchased new Hankook Ventus prime 3 K125,235/60R17 tires on 13.04.2020 for my Mercedes-Benz GLK-250 4x4 and was shocked on 19.10.2020 when I had them removed after just 9650km. The tires had completely worn out on the front axle (100%) and were still in relatively good condition on the rear axle (50%). I am an average driver, sticking to speed limits
- Vehicle:
- Mercedes GLK-Class (X204)
- Buy again?:
- Absolutely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 91H
- Drive comfort
- Quality of production
- Price/performance
- Rate
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 91H
- Drive comfort
- Quality of production
- Price/performance
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.
- Size:
- 195/55 R15 89V XL
- Rate
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.
- Size:
- 195/55 R15 89V XL
- Rate
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.
- Size:
- 195/55 R15 89V XL
- Rate
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.
- Size:
- 195/55 R15 89V XL
- Rate
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.
- Size:
- 205/65 R15 94H
- Rate