Tyre reviews Hankook K125 ventus prime 3. Page 12 316

  • Hankook K125 ventus prime 3
    Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

Статистика отзывов на шины Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Hankook K125 ventus prime 3 пользователями сайта: 4.65106 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Hankook K125 ventus prime 3: 312 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 556
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 322
Control on a dry road
Steering in the wet
Drive comfort
Quiet in motion
Braking efficiency
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Hankook K125 ventus prime 3 по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
3%
2
0%
3
2%
4
25%
5
70%
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    3.8

    Got disappointed in Continental and took Hankook on the advice of tire fitters. Well... on the "fourth". The quality looks decent, they behave normally in the rain, do not wear out quickly - but at the same time VERY noisy... That was the main disappointment. Probably got used to it in a week.

    Vehicle:
    Nissan Qashqai
    Size:
    215/60 R17 96V
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Saint Petersburg
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    Rate
    3.7

    Don't even think of buying this tire, two tires with sidewall bulges in two seasons, judging by the ads on Avito, it seems that many people have such tires with bulges, the sidewall is too soft, it can't withstand our potholes, the quietness and smoothness of the ride are good, the wear is fast

    Vehicle:
    Kia Ceed
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    Rate
    5

    Replaced Kislawed. Very satisfied, even better than Kislawed.

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen Passat
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.9

    Good tire, highly recommended.

    Vehicle:
    Nissan Serena
    Size:
    195/60 R16 89V
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Оренбург
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.9

    South Korea's tires, the best.

    Vehicle:
    Skoda Yeti
    Size:
    215/60 R16 99H XL
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Воркута
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    Rate
    5

    High-quality tire, definitely recommend!

    Vehicle:
    Skoda Octavia
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.6

    Vehicle:
    Lada Granta
    Size:
    195/50 R16 88V XL
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Сочи
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.8

    Good tires for the money. Excellent aquaplaning resistance.

    Vehicle:
    Kia Ceed
    Size:
    205/55 R16 91H
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Severodvinsk
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    Rate
    3.5

    I don't even know how to say it gently, but my tires are 205/50 R16, and the price of the tire was 12,100 at the time of purchase. This tire is not even mid-range, and its price is around 5,000-6,000 at most. The tire is not bad, but not worth that kind of money. I bought it after reading reviews, and I wouldn't have considered it if not for the limited options in this size, with only three real options: Hankook, Bridge T005, and Toyo CF2. I've driven on the last two, and the Turanza is a bit stiff but good for wear and rolling, while the Toyo is balanced but a complete disaster on any surface except asphalt. I should have gotten the Bridgestone, but I wanted something softer, and that's what I got - a tire with uncertain handling on dry roads, horribly bad on wet roads, and it's not even significantly softer than the Bridgestone. Fuel consumption is somehow higher than on my winter Hakkapeliitta 8 with spikes, and the only thing that's on par is the noise level, as the tire is quiet. Overall, I won't be throwing it away, since it's better than some unknown Chinese square tire, but I wouldn't recommend buying it for that kind of money, as it's not worth it. (For the sake of objectivity, I gave it a 5 for ice and snow, and I'm afraid to imagine how it would behave on ice and snow, considering its performance on wet roads.)

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen Polo
    Buy again?:
    More likely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Hankook K125 ventus prime 3

    Rate
    1.1

    I recently purchased new Hankook Ventus prime 3 K125,235/60R17 tires on 13.04.2020 for my Mercedes-Benz GLK-250 4x4 and was shocked on 19.10.2020 when I had them removed after just 9650km. The tires had completely worn out on the front axle (100%) and were still in relatively good condition on the rear axle (50%). I am an average driver, sticking to speed limits

    Vehicle:
    Mercedes GLK-Class (X204)
    Buy again?:
    Absolutely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability