Tyre reviews Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000. Страница 4 184
- Rate
Good tread and siping (no single sipe has fallen off in the first 2 seasons, the third has not been watched, apparently everything is fine). Straight-line braking is normal, acceleration is also good even on slippery roads.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tires have been standing for the second season, they hold the road perfectly both on ice and on snow, they pull like an all-terrain vehicle, my driving style is inclined towards racing, I drive in the city every day, the wear of the studs is minimal, not a single one has fallen out, due to the quality of our roads, I often hit potholes at high speed - not a single cut or hint of a bulge.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ Priora (2170) 1.5L 2007-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I purchased these tires for this winter season. My first impressions are very positive. So far, no problems have arisen. They perform well in snow and brake excellently on ice. After 7000km, not a single stud has come loose.
I wanted to buy Gislaved NF, but they were not available in our region. The seller recommended installing Bridge IC5000.
I will write a more detailed review later.
Serge- Vehicle:
- Kia Sportage 2,0TD 2005-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Tires are not a "fountain". Nevertheless, when purchasing, one should proceed from the safety criterion, rather than the "price-quality ratio" criterion. At a speed of 45-60 km/h, the car can really be blown off course, it's very noisy - especially after 60-70 km/h, and at a speed of 100 and above, the car "floats". If finances permit, of course, it's better to opt for a different tire brand.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Corolla 1,6L 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I drive 70% highway, 30% city.
In the city, it drives like all the others + (or rather minus - it's the noise)
On the highway where no one clears the snow, it performs excellently! Whether it's black ice or snow, it plows like a tractor, and it's hard to get stuck.- Vehicle:
- Toyota Carina E 2,0TD 1992-1998
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been using Bridg IC 5000 215/65R16 on my Craysler Voyager 150 hp.
Let me start from the beginning. Last year, I bought a minivan for myself and my family. It came with some used Amtel NM tires that were clearly smaller and worn out. After driving on them for about a month and a half, I realized that the car was heavy, and it was better not to skimp on tires. I went to
- Vehicle:
- Chrysler Voyager 2,4L 1992-1995
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I'm very pleased with the purchase! On ice, dry asphalt, snow slush, etc. they confidently hold the road. A bit noisy on dry asphalt, but that's a small price to pay for safety. Besides, it's hard to name a brand of studded tires that doesn't make noise. The price-quality ratio is beyond praise. I recommend purchasing.
- Vehicle:
- Great Wall Hover 2.4L 2005-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
excellent tires
I've driven for two seasons. After the second season, the loss of studs is minimal. The road holding is 5+, the tires are soft. Ice, slush, snow - no problems. A bit noisy.
Pros: Price quality
Cons: I think there are almost none- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
Matches the price
I've been using these tires for 1 month (November). Compared to Nord Frost 3: significant noise in the 40 - 45 km/h range. At other speed ranges - the noise disappears or is insignificant. Traction qualities are very even on ice, on snow, on wet asphalt. Predictable.
- Rate
Stiff, noisy (in the speed range of 40-70 km/h) tires.
I've been driving on these tires for the second season. The mileage is around 30,000 km, so I've made my own conclusions. The tires are stiff, which is a plus for wear resistance, but a minus for strong frosts. I assess the loss of spikes as normal - after the first season, I didn't find any spikes that had fallen out. At the moment
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance