Tyre reviews Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000. Страница 3 184

  • Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000
    Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

Статистика отзывов на шины Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000 пользователями сайта: 4.02 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000: 184 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 914
  • Место в рейтинге (шипованные): 165
Control on a dry road
Braking on dry roads
Steering in the wet
Braking on wet roads
Control in the snow
Control on ice
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Internal noise
Quiet in motion
Braking efficiency
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price justifiability
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000 по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
5%
2
5%
3
6%
4
43%
5
41%
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    2.3

    The first two seasons were faithful companions. Snow and ice – nothing to write home about: - the snow raked and buried, the ice chomped. Only on turns was it unpredictable (sometimes it threw me into a skid, or the rear end would lock up). In a straight line, it held well, but then again, there's a catch – on dry asphalt, the growl persists (it's cured only by loud music). And here's the most interesting thing: The

    Vehicle:
    Nissan Almera  1,5L  2000-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.1

    225/55/R17

    Drove on it for three seasons (2007-2009), with a total mileage of about 20,000 km. Disadvantages: is too soft, in turns gives noticeable understeer; requires countersteering on straights; makes a lot of noise. Advantages: in three seasons I lost only a few studs on the entire set! (considering the front drive and 250 horsepower - the anti-lock braking system was not always able

    Vehicle:
    Chrysler 300M  3,5L  1998-2004
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.5

    The tire was on the 14th rim with no complaints. Now, it's on the Nissan, and I'm overall satisfied, as it never locked up and I never got into a precarious situation. As for the noise, let's not forget that it's a winter tire with studs.

    Vehicle:
    Nissan Primera  1,6L  1996-2002
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.7

    I struggled for a long time to choose a winter tire, affordable and good quality. As the IC5000 is no longer produced, the price is lower, I managed to find it in one of the stores, brought from the stockroom - bought, installed.

    I immediately noticed that it is much louder than the summer tire)))

    But then the studs wore down and it seems it got quieter.

    What I can say - good tire and especially it's cheap.

    I haven't compared it with anything yet

    Vehicle:
    Honda Stream  1,7L  2001-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.7

    The tires have been running for the third season. Not a single stud has fallen off in three years, it’s durable, it holds the road well, whether dry, or ice and snow. Overall, the tire is excellent, the only drawback is that it’s noisy on the highway above 80. But the inconvenience is more than compensated by the safety on the road.

    Vehicle:
    Nissan Almera Classic  1.6L  2006-2008
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.4

    Four out of five stars.
    I drove 5 winters (about 50,000 km) in St. Petersburg and Finland.
    The studs lasted only until the fourth winter.
    It's quiet.
    A little bit soft, but I even liked it.
    The only minus is that in the last, fifth season, it started to badly grip ( wore out the sipes, although the tread itself was still

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen T4  2,5TD  1998-2003
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.5

    Excellent tire. Truthfully, the first year it was like a jet-plane (50-70 km/h range), but in the second season it settled in and is now not very noisy.

    Holds the road perfectly, the only comment is that on black ice (frosted) in a turn it slightly understeers the rear axle. But here you need to choose a safe speed. On ice, acceleration and braking are 4-. Almost never reaches ABS. Drifts during

    Vehicle:
    Opel Corsa D  1,2L  2006-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.6

    I always loved (bought this type for the past 8 years and the current car as well) and still love, unfortunate that they discontinued it - I'll buy the updated 7000, more expensive but I won't change the brand.

    Vehicle:
    Hyundai Elantra  1,6L  2000-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    4.2

    Drove for 2 seasons. For an off-road vehicle, it's better to opt for the non-directional tread pattern - it digs in on the way in but doesn't hold the curve on the way out On the track at 150 km/h it holds up well, but on the turns you have to be more careful. Over the 2 years, the studs have remained in place, even though I've been driving on asphalt. Overall, I'm satisfied. As for those who have

    Vehicle:
    Toyota Land Cruiser 95 Prado  3,0TD  1996-2003
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000

    Rate
    2.6

    Drove for two seasons. Size 215/70R16. My first studded tires. Overall impression - disaster! 15-20% studs came loose in two seasons (I'm honest, drove like on non-studded tires, in front of the rails and etc. didn't slow down). Will not speak about noise - within normal range for studded tires. On ice or packed snow, braked no better than non-studded Bridgestone DM-01, and on asphalt

    Vehicle:
    Chevrolet Niva  1,8L  2000-2008
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability