Tyre reviews Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 5000. Страница 5 184

Made for snow and ice

Rolled two winters. On snow and ice, it's okay. But in the city and on a clean highway, the main minus is NOISE - it hums so much that it seems like it's about to take off, especially at speeds of 50-60 km/h, after driving for more than 2-3 hours, my head even started to hurt from this hum. On wet asphalt, brake wisely - the grip is not very good,

Snowmobile
The snow passability is excellent, but you ride like on a caterpillar tractor, the track formation is excellent!)))
Pros: track formation, passability!
Cons: studs come out, the tire itself holds perfectly, very loud!

Good

Good tires, drove 2 seasons, about 25,000 km, then stolen from the garage. Minimal wear, all studs in place, noise is moderate, summer rumble is louder. Holds the road very well; on ice, snow, and snowmash - just perfect. Turns - wonderfully. One-time runs of 900 km in one direction withstands well (200 km - salted asphalt, 700 km - compacted snow, icing, snowmash).

I've been driving on these tires for 2 years now and I have no complaints! When I first got behind the wheel of my VAZ 2115, it had Amtelek tires on it, I don't remember exactly which ones (summer tires). Winter came and I had to choose something. I wanted to go with a Japanese manufacturer, I looked over many tires and in the end I settled on Bridgestone 5000! As soon as I switched from Amtelek (

It's ideal for all cities except Moscow, everything is very good. The minus is that it really doesn't like to drive in snow, you can get stuck in courtyards, and where you can pass on Kamaz, it gets stuck right away, and you have to start moving slowly in deep snow. I was choosing between Nokian, Gislaved, Conti, and, of course, Bridgestone. I've driven all of them, and I chose Bridgestone

Excellent tire! The only downside - it's noisy at 60 km/h. Mazda is already a noisy car and when the wheel arches resonate with the mudguards, it's not a pleasant feeling! I live in Odintsovo, often drive on Podushkinskoye Highway, both on black ice and in wet snow - they never let me down. And the road there is quite tricky. The Japanese are doing a great job!

A bit noisy. As noted below, there is a tendency to slip when starting and high braking characteristics on any winter surface. After 140 km/h, there is a feeling of losing reliability of control (comfort on the highway 100-120). It drains water well. With a sufficiently active driving style, all the spikes are in place and the degree of wear is very small. I recommend it to everyone - even for quite powerful cars. For its money, it's unrivaled.

Excellent tires. It so happened that I had to drive on them winter-summer-winter. Now, after 45,000 km, it's already time to change the front wheels, as the wear is already over 50% and the studs flew out in the summer =) On the rear wheels, the wear may be 10-20%, it's almost imperceptible. The studs are 90% in place. I don't skimp on tires, although my car costs like

Terrible! As an experienced driver, as well as a sales and procurement manager (a qualified specialist) in the wheel department of a large auto complex, I can firmly state that for such a price, I would rather drive on Michelin. The price absolutely does not correspond to the quality and driving characteristics of the tire. Such models of tires can have a negative impact on the brand itself. So why ruin the reputation?

Hard 4. Very noisy and rigid. I drive a lot. So it's better to be noisy than to have unpleasant surprises. The spikes are securely attached. Not a single one has come off. On ice and compacted snow (at traffic lights and stops) it behaves perfectly. It accelerates from the start without slipping (if you're careful and don't press the pedal to the floor like a fool, you know... there are many things that can go wrong), unlike the neighbors.