Tyre reviews Bridgestone Potenza GIII 12

I'd like to report the mileage. I purchased from the official dealer and have run 70,000 km. I think I can still safely run another 30,000 km. On the Falken that came on the car I've run 70,000 km in total. The rest of the mileage is on Yokohama and I think that will last another 40,000 km. I'm very satisfied with the tire, but it's extremely noisy.

I got the wheels with 60% wear on the front and 80% on the back, I thought it would be like skiing... but as it turned out, absolutely not, even with such wear and my 200-strong engine on rear-wheel drive, the road held well... I drove 10,000 km on such wear and now I'm finishing, I've already bought 2 front Maxxis wheels and cursed everything... on the killed Bridgestone, braking was better than on the

Generally not bad

The tire holds perfectly on both wet and dry roads. Very soft ride, feeling "like on rails". It's better not to leave the asphalt. However, we pay for all this with very rapid wear (no matter what the ads say) - after 20,000 km of mileage, it's literally "ZERO!!!", and this is with a moderate driving mode. 20-05-2007

Noisy and hard rubber

The rubber is not bad, but it's very noisy and hard, at +7 it already becomes hard and loses all its properties. On water, it behaves very well, I haven't noticed aquaplaning even once. It deserves a special respect for that. The mileage was 12,000 with a moderate driving style.

Budget option in the absence of special claims

Personally, I drove on this tire for a season (15,000 km). Before that, it had been driven for two more seasons. I have already removed it with minimal tread.

After Yokohama AVS SPORT 102 G3, as it is greased with oil, especially when cold, the road is not held at all

the best tires I've driven on
Pros: road grip, handling, in any weather conditions
Cons: noisy, stiff - but the grip is worth it

Wears too quickly, but this is the price for the tire's softness.

Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.