Tyre reviews Кама И 520 Пилигрим. Page 3 226

  • Кама И 520 Пилигрим
    Кама И 520 Пилигрим

Статистика отзывов на шины Кама И 520 Пилигрим

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Кама И 520 Пилигрим пользователями сайта: 4.61928 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Кама И 520 Пилигрим: 222 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 639
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 377
  • Место в рейтинге (всесезонные): 186
Control on a dry road
Steering in the wet
Drive comfort
Quiet in motion
Braking efficiency
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price justifiability
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Кама И 520 Пилигрим по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
5%
2
2%
3
4%
4
8%
5
82%
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Fake review
    Rate
    4.6

    I drive on them in summer and in deep off-season. Asphalt and partially dirt roads: everywhere, if not super, then generally all right. The tire is durable, wear-resistant.

    Vehicle:
    ВАЗ Vesta
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.3

    I didn't intentionally drive into thick rough terrain, but where I needed to go hunting, I drove. They were balanced in principle quite well, from 40 to 140 grams per wheel. I didn't notice any particular noise, the car is a Kia Sportage of the 1st generation. In principle, it's definitely worth its money! I don't think that a Chinese tyre for the same price would be better. I don't see the point in comparing it to Yokohama, Bridgestone, and others due to the price difference

    Vehicle:
    Kia Sportage
    Size:
    235/75 R15 105S
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Пятигорск
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Rate
    4.1

    REPLACED ON UAZ 31519 INSTEAD OF THE ORIGINAL ONE AFTER BUYING THE VEHICLE IN 2002. AT PRESENT THE VEHICLE HAS RUN FOR 114 THOUSAND KILOMETERS, THERE ARE NO CRACKS, THE PROTECTOR IS LEFT WITH A REMAINING THICKNESS OF 5 MM. NORMAL OPERATION, WINTER IN THE CITY + SUMMER FISHING, WITHOUT STRONG GOVENS RUBBER. IT

    Vehicle:
    УАЗ Hunter
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Rate
    4.6

    Purchased 5 in 2007, ran 78000 km, travelled to the Caucasus, Crimea and Russia.
    Active use, speed, braking, rocky terrain, saline sea clay (Northern Caspian Sea) Approximately 2.5 mm of wear left.
    Showed the dealers where I bought it (not expected from the Russian manufacturer) Still installed.

    Vehicle:
    Mitsubishi Space Gear  2,8TD  1994-2000
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Rate
    3.6

    Great tire for the price. One set worn out, thought about which to buy – GT or Pirelli. GT is $200 per tire, Pirelli is $90. Didn't notice any difference in driving qualities, though. Price speaks for itself. Downside: sidewalls crack earlier than tread on both tires. Upside: if you don't overinflate, it's soft and comfortable on potholes on asphalt. Will buy Pirelli again (don't trust Chinese or

    Vehicle:
    Hyundai Galloper  2,5TD  1997-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Rate
    2.2

    The tire is worth its price, but no more. It picks up dirt well, is not afraid of stones. Sand is no problem, its off-road capabilities are moderate. On dry asphalt, it's no trouble to understand its handling, but on wet roads it behaves erratically, will not turn, won't brake.

    Vehicle:
    Toyota 4 runner  2,4TD  1988-1995
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Rate
    4.6

    I put them on Bukhanochka, we drive on it, metal scrap is dripping, operating conditions are without any peculiarities, mainly asphalt, and it allows you to turn into the forest. There's no point in buying expensive tires for this, and these have enough rubber and wear out much slower than mud tires. On a new one, I measured the tread in the area of 14 mm, now I've driven 25 thousand kilometers on it, the remaining tread is about 10 mm, you can still drive and drive. The rubber is soft, well-balanced, not noisy, there are no problems with availability, and the price is acceptable. Even in winter, it drives relatively well and remains soft enough in the frost.

    Vehicle:
    УАЗ 3909
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Fake review
    Rate
    4.8

    The only thing they can't do is work with wet asphalt at speed, when there's a lot of water, you have to slow down. Otherwise, the tires are excellent.

    Vehicle:
    Mitsubishi Pajero
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Rate
    4.7

    The tire has several strong points. First, it is wear-resistant, wears out extremely slowly. Second, it handles well on any loose surface, such as snow, sand, dirt, gravel, etc. There are no questions about that. Third, not the most important thing for such a tire, but it has a relatively comfortable ride despite its aggressive tread. The downsides are that it doesn't handle water very well due to its design (I think there are not enough central grooves), it's noisy at high speeds, and, as expected, requires extra caution on ice. Overall, it has met all my expectations by 140 percent. I highly recommend it.

    Vehicle:
    УАЗ Hunter
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама И 520 Пилигрим

    Fake review
    Rate
    4.6

    Overall, the tires are decent. The price is not high, the rubber is not crooked, and they handle clearly. In other respects, they are ordinary. I didn't expect much from them, but so far I'm satisfied.

    Vehicle:
    Suzuki Grand Vitara
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability