Tyre reviews Cooper Discoverer M+S. Page 1 463

I've used it for three winters. Rating: solid 4 out of 5. I bought it because of its price in 2011, at that time the price-quality ratio was good, but now it has increased significantly. First impressions: heavy, noisy. However, after a while you understand that these are inevitable drawbacks that you have to get used to, as there are many other good qualities.

Pros:

- Excellent on snow, there is no

I bought them in a non-studded version and slightly used. I rode on them throughout the year, at +40 and -25 degrees Celsius. It's a great tire for its price. In the winter, it's very predictable, performs well on both dry and wet asphalt, and brakes well. The only thing to be careful with in the summer is on asphalt, as the ABS kicks in too quickly. The tire, of course, is not designed for high temperatures. But if you don

Here is the translated text:

As promised, I'm writing a review! I've taken a winter holiday. Before that, I had Cooper Weather Master S/T 2. What I want to say is that on dry roads - it's simply excellent! There's no noise during driving! It holds the road perfectly, doesn't aquaplane. It's lightweight (compared to STT).

It snowplows the snow.

On ice, it brakes - not very happily :-(.

I

The previous set of tires was of the same brand and had already clocked over 100,000 kilometers. Sometimes I would push them to the limit with jumps over logs and hard cornering on the kerb. However, at the junction of two concrete slabs at a speed of 120 km/h, the right front tire burst. I then had to buy a new set, although the old ones could have lasted another year on the tread. Speaking of handling at 70 tread depth is unnecessary

Ran not much, so the knowledge is not profound. But the impression is quite not bad. Drives and brakes on ice at a decent level (there is something to compare with haka and continental and etc.) On the snow - very good. Loud on asphalt - it's there. Can't say anything about wear resistance - rode not much. Before that, I rode for two seasons on "Heracles" - they liked more, but they weren't available in my size... Heracles

Installed 267/70 R17 on stock rims on a 2013 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. One of the best options for the money! The tire was chosen with the intention of going off-road on weekends. Most of the time it ran on a small town's unpaved roads, 5% on the highway. Didn't venture far into the woods, mostly just a gentle slope and soft snow. Did get stuck where fear made my eyes close (BFGoodrich Mud Terrain),

265/70R16 tires 8" strong, wear-resistant tires. The car "stands" well, except for a specific ice, on which, in my opinion, the tires need to have a lot of studs or small soft studs, or all together.

Used the tire for 3 seasons and will be putting it back on again. Tire is of excellent quality. For 3 seasons, the tread is almost in the same condition. I've lost around 5-7% (visually). The protector has worn off by around 30%. On both dry and wet roads, the car is behaving as expected. The steering is very responsive, and I haven't noticed any aquaplaning. The only minus I've noticed is that on a

After buying the car in the spring of 2013, I purchased these tires in size 245/75 r16LT. As of now, I have driven on them for three winters with an approximate total mileage of 40000km. To be honest, the second time around I am seriously doubting whether I will buy them again. I was swayed by the positive reviews on Market when purchasing them.

Minuses:

- Extremely hard and heavy rubber. It is badly balanced (I have

In 2013 I ordered a new set for my new car, which I drove about 130,000 km with the standard summer tires, over half of which on the Discovery. At the moment, I'm "finishing" them off with summer driving and I want new ones. The first 30-40 thousand over the first two winters handled the car perfectly, the third winter I could have already changed to new ones, but I still managed to get by without replacing them. I put