Tyre reviews Continental ContiVikingContact 6 SUV. Страница 3 68

Good tire, but expected more traction on slippery surface. Said to have the same issue on studs.

I'm now in my second season with this tire. Thought it would be much better, but on the ice, it's just a crapshoot... it understeers easily on light ice and if you get a snow flurry on top, you better be ready to land. In summary, the tire is okay, but on ice/snow you need to drive very, very carefully. Price doesn't match.

Satisfied with the tyre in general.

Great, but slippery to the side when driving on ice.

Tires are quite good, but if I'm being honest, I was expecting more from Continental.

It should be noted that the review is about tires produced in Germany

Excellent tire, I recommend it

Good tires for winter in cities where 70% of roads are covered with snow. Quiet and good handling on snowy, wet and slippery roads.

I'm not a fan of writing reviews, but I just have to share my thoughts and hopefully this will prevent others from going through the same experience. This is the worst winter tire I've ever had the misfortune of riding on. The only positive aspects are that it's relatively quiet, soft, well-balanced, grips dry asphalt, and isn't too bad in the snow at low speeds. That's it. Moscow's snowy winter showed that these tires are better suited to the label "dem

These are my first non-studded winter tires. My car is 4 years old and the previous studded tires were worn out. I decided to try "knobby". I read a lot of reviews and took my time. In the end, I was left with two contenders: Nokian WR SUV 3 and Continental ContiVikingContact 6. According to the tests, most of the results were higher for Nokian than Continental ContiVikingContact