Tyre reviews Bridgestone Turanza ER300. Page 4 3211
- Rate
Price-quality is far from perfect. They're terrible in the rain, especially on potholed roads, are very prone to aquaplaning (the biggest drawback of these tyres, even the budget Hankook with 3mm tread depth performed a lot better on the wet track). In the dry they're normal, but no more.
- Vehicle:
- Honda Civic 1,8L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Disappointment.
Prior to this, I had run 50,000 km on a Michelin Energy E3A, purchased with 5 mm tread depth (German production). After 50,000 km, the tread had worn down to 4 mm, but a lot of cuts appeared...
As a result, a Bridgestone tire (Italian production) was purchased by chance, based on the principle that a branded tire can be bad.- Vehicle:
- BMW 5(E34) 2,0L 1988-1995
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Very satisfied. Previously, I had the stock Kumho, and my god, what a noise it made!
The ABS no longer constantly kicks in, and I no longer spin my wheels when I take off. I'm glued to the road. I've driven 1500 miles back and forth on dry roads and then in the rain. I did 150-170 on the way there, and 120-140 on the way back. I'm still satisfied. I can compare it
- Vehicle:
- Kia Cerato 1,6L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Ran for 2 seasons. Mostly city. Last summer the tire literally melted. Wore out to zero. Didn't expect, thought it would last till autumn. On the track fine, wet asphalt, puddles – like on rails. Honestly, it seemed too noisy to me (true, Kamryuk has noise issues), and fairly stiff. In principle, suitable for active use. But because of the noise, I'll take another one.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Camry 3,5L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
215/55 R16, summer tyres - I'll say right out that the tyres came from the previous owner, but two of the four had two squats on the sidewalls in general, in my opinion, these tyres aren't worth the money.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Passat 1,8L 2001-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Excellent tires. I took them to replace the worn-out Dunlop, took the Japanese production.
On dry pavement, they brake like stuck, the tires are hard but at the same time wear out faster than, say, the same Dunlop or other competitors. But this is not a minus, it's a consequence of the mixture that Bridgestone prepared, if you want good brakes on any surface, be prepared for rapid wear and noise, if you're not ready, take quiet but
- Vehicle:
- Renault Megane scenic 2,0L 16V 1999-2003
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good dry and wet grip, stays on track in sudden sharp turns. Good performance in heavy rain. A bit noisy, but... Not so soft, but provides good comfort. Wear is still tolerable compared to the price. Quite durable on sharp curbs and other precious stones. Recommended
- Vehicle:
- Opel Vectra 2.0 DTI Caravan
- Size:
- 195/65 R15 H
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
This is an awesome summer tire with really good traction and an excellent price. Perfect for wet and dry conditions, but forget about it, letting them in any snow/slush or ice. Most touring tires have little traction in these conditions, and these are no exception.
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 ZR
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Good performance in summer and rain. Very stable at high speeds and in turns. Very difficult connection causing unpleasant (actually no performance) performance on snow/ice and a lot of tire noise. Wear is too high for such a hard connection.
- Vehicle:
- SEAT TOLEDO
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 V
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Wearability
- Rate
Very good handling on dry and wet roads, comfortable ride. Never put me in a difficult situation while driving on asphalt roads. Performance on wet fade noticeably as the tires reached wear. Poor on snow (not surprisingly, since it's a summer tire), got stuck twice on an uphill slope despite being 4x4. Relatively hard to handle so can handle some short, soft off-road driving on dry gravel roads, but wore out faster than expected.
- Vehicle:
- Suzuki SX4
- Size:
- 205/60 R16 H
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability