Tyre reviews Yokohama C.Drive AC01. Page 3 413

I don't recommend them. They are definitely noisy, even when the car is fully soundproofed. On dry roads, they're not bad, but during intense driving and frequent lane changes, the response to the steering wheel is not clear and delayed, and the steering feels sluggish. A bit of wetness, the start of rain - THAT'S IT, YOU'RE DONE, you need to slow down immediately, especially in turns where skidding is guaranteed. You can drive in the rain with a

A decent balanced tire.

The rubber was purchased due to cost considerations - it's hard to find something else for less than 100 euros in this size. And no special requirements were imposed on it. However, it turned out to be a good, honest workhorse. It doesn't cause strong emotions - however, everyone notes that the car rolls noticeably easier on this tire. Well, and sometimes it's surprising that the tire handles complex situations unexpectedly well. I, having driven on it for

Good tires, worth their money

I purchased them recently, at the beginning of January, considering that we have a subtropical climate, the tire was taken as all-season, but the other day I had to drive to the more northern regions of our vast Motherland. Along the way, I had to drive on both dry asphalt and wet, and through snowy mush - the road is held confidently, nowhere did I lose traction. And when I had to drive up a fairly gentle slope covered with

Big tires for little money

I drove on a Mercedes with these tires for one summer, 225/55R16. They wore out completely after 30 thousand kilometers. The tires didn't impress me overall. They react very strongly to road grooves - I put Hakkas on in the winter and the same grooves on the road seemed to disappear. They hydroplane early in the rain. They're noisy. You can barely hear them only on roads with freshly laid asphalt, but how

Tire for good roads

In the city and on new asphalt without rutting, everything is super, but on the Moscow Ring Road in the left lane, it's a disaster, after 10 minutes at a speed of 120-140, the whole thing is wet, you can wring out a t-shirt, you need to grip the steering wheel with both hands and be careful, careful and careful again.. It just throws on the rut, to the right, to the left by

I'm happy with the elephant :)

I don't pay attention to the noise, since trance music is always playing at full volume. When braking, it behaves above all praise. In high-speed turns, it holds like a tram, and on wet roads too. Aquaplaning is good.

Economy class on 5
In general, the tire is not bad. First of all, it attracts with its price. I bought 195/60 R14 for 1700 rubles. Visually, it attracts the eye, and it handles the road well on dry pavement. When cornering, it's not worth speeding up, as it will slowly drift.
Pros: Stylish design
Cons: Low wear resistance 04-05-2008

You guys are racing!!!

You're not guys, you just all "race"!!!!! Do you even study what you're buying before you buy it???? Who do you think the speed index is written for on tires??? You all complain about rapid wear.... THIS IS NATURAL IF YOU HAVE AN EXTREME DRIVING STYLE. THE HIGHER THE SPEED INDEX, THE HARDER THE RUBBER --> consequently, RAPID WEAR

normal tires
I just installed Toyo and had a chance to drive in the rain and on dry pavement, great rubber!! I don't know about wear yet, we'll see, after Nokian, this one seems quieter. Doesn't bounce on grooves, maybe because of the size 195-50-15 and I drove at 140-150
Pros: I like them

In general, it's GOOD

The native tire was installed on the Toyota Corolla when I bought it, and it showed itself to be 5 minus after 2,000 miles of mileage. It drives stably and has good traction both in the rain and on dry asphalt. However, when I was crossing tram tracks, they were felt very strongly, and on bad roads, like in the village and beyond (broken into pieces), it's average, although on gravel it rolls only with