Tyre reviews Кама Никола. Page 2 41

  • Кама Никола
    Кама Никола

Статистика отзывов на шины Кама Никола

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Кама Никола пользователями сайта: 4.13902 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Кама Никола: 41 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 730
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 360
  • Место в рейтинге (всесезонные): 72
Control on a dry road
Steering in the wet
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Quiet in motion
Rate
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Кама Никола по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
0%
2
5%
3
5%
4
85%
5
5%
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    4.1

    I took the Nicolò after the all-season campaign of "Belyshin". The Kama, of course, is significantly noisier on asphalt, but it handles snow quite well, with minimal wheel slip. I really liked it, as Belyshin was almost completely useless in the snow, despite being considered an all-season tyre. I've been using it for four years, mostly on asphalt on the track, a bit in the city, in any weather every day. But then

    Vehicle:
    Gaz 3102(3110)  2,4L  1996-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    3.1

    Hello everyone. Second season driving on KAMA NIKOLA. Tire wear is minimal, the tread is more like all-season, so it grips well. But the vibration is annoying - it's a complete disaster, a free vibratory massage. The wheels are apparently oval - egg-shaped, so at low speed you drive as if the wheel is twisted and about to fall off. But somehow not always, sometimes there is no vibration at all. Different pressure in the tires barely changes the situation. GOD FORBID ANYONE FROM BUYING THIS STUFF. Good luck to everyone.

    Vehicle:
    Chevrolet Rezzo
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    4.5

    Drove it for two years, on a company car, with no hard acceleration or braking - it was beautiful!

    Vehicle:
    Gaz 3102(3110)  2,4L  1996-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    4.6

    When I bought them, I had doubts about how they would perform, but after a week all my doubts disappeared. After all, our manufacturer has started making good tires, which I'm very happy about. The price-quality ratio is excellent! I'm satisfied.

    Vehicle:
    Ford Galaxy  2,0L  1995-2000
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.1

    Good tires.

    Vehicle:
    Nissan Tiida
    Size:
    195/65 R15 91H
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Moscow
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    4.1

    I've read plenty of reviews about this tire, from blatant nonsense to invented praises. It's worth the money, but don't expect miracles, drive carefully and you'll be happy.

    Vehicle:
    Gaz 3102(3110)  2,4L  1996-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    4.5

    Addendum to my initial statement: I haven't tried the new Nikola tire in the winter (my expectation is that its characteristics wouldn't drop off drastically even with wear). I took it in early summer, after summer use (afraid of no dirt in the tanks 100%) on the first ice said bai bai Nikola, winter isn't for you. My specification - FIRST safety (handling braking) then speed and then durability, noise and rubber flexibility are by the way.

    Vehicle:
    Gaz 3102(3110)  2,4L  1996-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    4.7

    super
    EXCELLENT TIRE GIVES NOT EXPECTED FROM OUR MANUFACTURERS, I HAVE DACIA LOGAN DIESEL SEDAN AND SUCH TREAD, IN TURNS I GO AT 120 WITHOUT PROBLEMS 195/65 R15
    Pros: -
    Cons: -

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Butt-like, not rubber
    rubber is crap! can't think of anything worse...as soon as it gets a bit cold it's like wood! better to put Amtele than this scam!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Pros: none
    Cons: material quality! and just crap

  • about tyre Кама Никола

    Rate
    5
    Size:
    195/65 R15 91H
    Drive comfort
    Quality of production
    Price/performance