Tyre reviews Кама 301. Page 2 71

Normal tires, I put them on a Gazel until I sold it. I didn't expect much from them, the main thing is the price and the possibility to easily replace them if needed. They performed well on snow and also handled mud well.

Four wheels were bought on a Gazel, mounted on the rear axle. Two of them burst along the sidewall! Worse than that is the "Forward".

Excellent tires, durable, loads well and holds the road with confidence!

It turned out that the price determined the choice, which fell on Kama 301, and it turned out to be very worthy. I drive calmly both in the city and outside it, and not only on asphalt, but also on dirt or gravel, and there are no complaints, and it has already been on the wheels for two seasons

My GAZelle is shod with these tires, and the result is stunning. They travel from 60 to 100 thousand kilometers without problems. The sidewalls are reliable, impact-resistant, and the grip on a wet road at a moderate speed is impressive. The tires handle light off-road with ease, are not prone to punctures, and are always easily accessible. In general, no more quality and reliability is needed.

Kama is the optimal solution in terms of price-quality ratio. On our roads with their half-meter pits, these tires perform great, and despite the fact that I haven't had any puncture problems yet, they provide excellent traction both on asphalt and on dirt roads. Even on a wet road, the tires hold firmly, as if on rails. At the same time, the wear remains moderate, which is also pleasing.

Tires hold asphalt decently, mash snow slush decently. Price is acceptable, as the main point of choice. I don't overload, 32 thousand, still intact.

Not bad tires. I drive a weight of 2.5-3 tons. No problems.

The tire developed longitudinal cracks all the way around after 18,000 km, I am shocked.

Regular tire. Price-quality ratio is just perfect.