Tyre reviews Кама 202. Page 2 15

  • Кама 202
    Кама 202

Статистика отзывов на шины Кама 202

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Кама 202 пользователями сайта: 4 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Кама 202: 15 шт.
Control on a dry road
Steering in the wet
Drive comfort
Quiet in motion
Braking efficiency
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price justifiability
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Кама 202 по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
NAN%
2
NAN%
3
INF%
4
NAN%
5
NAN%
  • about tyre Кама 202

    Rate
    2.2

    Never buy Kama tires for trucks.

    All tires are like an egg. You'll be bouncing like on a horse. Braking on wet asphalt is almost non-existent!!! The tread is still like new, but replacement is inevitable. And this is summer and autumn! Winter is coming soon, so jumping and bouncing plus the lack of braking effect leaves no choice. And these symptoms are present in all cars that have Kama tires!

    Vehicle:
    Iveco Daily
    Buy again?:
    Absolutely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 202

    Rate
    2.1

    Expensive tires, mileage around 3 thousand km, wear occurred before our eyes. It feels like they're made of plasticine. I strongly advise against buying them.

    Vehicle:
    Huanghai Ruitu
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 202

    Rate
    3

    I bought 4 of them in January and they lasted roughly half a year, maybe a bit more than 10,000km, but two of them went out with a bead blowout at a month interval, one on the inner side and the other on the outer side. So, by no means, do not buy them!!! CLEAN BRACK!!! They performed great in the winter, not noisy, but the cord quality is poor...

    There was no such brand (Canter)

    Vehicle:
    Mitsubishi ASX
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 202

    Rate
    2.5

    The old one was 202 17.5 and started to deteriorate along the protector. The boss didn't think for long and took the same new one. Both tires are wandering along the ellipse. You can drive, but only at 70+.

    Vehicle:
    Hyundai H350
    Buy again?:
    Absolutely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 202

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    3.4

    Economical Commercial Tires. Noise-generating tire with a focus on durability.

    Vehicle:
    ГАЗ Соболь
    Size:
    215/75 R17,5 124/123M
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Петрозаводск
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability