Tyre reviews Bridgestone Blizzak WS60. Page 6 161

No others needed

WS60 This is my second set of Bridgestone Blizzak, apparently I'm such a fan of this brand of tires that I stole the first set (Blizzak Revo1) from the garage. It holds the road, the braking distance is less than on studded tires. Silence, as if flying low, not driving fast. All acquaintances eventually switch to Bridgestone Blizzak.

Pros: People, this is the best tire

Good winter traction. Moderately soft, not noisy, good balancing. Comfortable on both clean asphalt and in slush, on rolled snow. Bare ice is not considered, because there's nothing to do there, either on studded or on non-studded tires.

Bridgestone Blizzak WS-60 205/55 R16 91R
A very good model, which unfortunately is no longer in production.
The tire is very soft and comfortable. At first, it was very quiet, but by the beginning of the third season it started to whine. It grips snow very well, but it's not worth driving on ice at all.
For durability, it showed itself very well after 2 seasons. In dry

Absolute rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!In just one winter, 50% of the tread on the front tires is worn out. The road is not gripped at all, it shakes and does not brake. If you put it on before the snow, when it's +2...+5 degrees outside, it doesn't grip the road at all!!! I don't know how people used to drive before. Maybe on Taganka, for example? What is this rubbish that people praise? I advise everyone who

I want to try these tires this winter.

Hello everyone. I rode on the Volga 3110 for three winters on Gislaved frost 3 (studded), just super! Sold the Volga, bought the Lanos 1.6, tires 185.60.14. Again, I looked for Gislaved, but the 3 is discontinued, there is a 5, also studded. I liked the 5, but it doesn't come in

I've been driving on Bridgestone for three years, before that I had other brands
Everything suits me in the tires, the only drawback is that the tires don't like ABS, but it seems to me that this is the case with any tires. But I've gotten used to this peculiarity.
Pros: Soft, quiet, and has good tread life.
Cons: Currently, there are none. Winter and spring will show.

A good tire, but with its own characteristics

I drove the previous season, about 20,000 kilometers around Moscow and the Moscow region. Before buying new tires for my new car this year, I decided to leave a review: It behaves excellently on uncleared snow, wonderfully on packed snow and on ice (it's even unclear how and what it clings to - I used to love spinning around in the yard "in place with a skid" - this one doesn't!!!

Very satisfied with the choice
I drove 5000km on Bridgestone WS60, I hesitated for a long time when choosing. The tires are soft, they hold the road confidently, there have been no complaints so far, I'm very pleased with my choice!!! I myself drive a Priora.
Pros: Soft, quiet...
Cons: None so far

Seems like a great tire, I was very surprised that it's so cheap

I just bought it, after the start of strong ice (I barely made it to the car), everywhere in the city it costs 3700 rubles, and I found it in a good store for 3070 rubles during the New Year's sale, kind of like a holiday discount :))) First plus. :) We immediately tested it: acceleration, sharp braking on ice, entering a turn at high

Quiet on wet asphalt, snow porridge is great
a big minus is that it is very heavy, harsh.