Tyre reviews Bridgestone Blizzak WS60. Page 5 161

You've been cheated..

I'm doing comparisons with the WS 60 and ContiVikingContact5. In my opinion, the second one is much better, I don't know why you were told it's not available, the tires are absolutely new, probably because they don't have them in stock, but they need to sell. BUT I would buy ContiVikingContact5. Reviews are stable 27-11-2008

An excellent option

Both for me and super. I chose for a long time. Compared, boiled my brain. Spent a lot of time on it. Conclusion: for those who drive without extreme, you should pay attention first of all to the normal condition of city roads, the noise of the tires and their wear. Don't bother with the "magical" properties of expensive tires. You don't need it. Don't overpay for the brand and for "air". By

excellent winter tire

I changed to blizzak ws60 at the end of October, drove 2000km, the first 1500km drove in warm weather, usually 7-10 degrees, the tire sometimes "floats", creating a feeling of an air cushion, a very unusual feeling - like there is contact and it's not holding, and like you're sliding on the asphalt... you can see the high and soft lamellas being compressed.

very good

Compared to the praised "Nokian Hakkapeliitta" (drove last year), it holds the road no worse on any surface, but is cheaper in my size by 1200 rubles per tire. The driving manner has hardly changed with the onset of winter and strong ice compared to driving on asphalt, only when braking on ice sharply on a car with ABS, you need to pulse until the ABS kicks in, then release and press again all the way.

Excellent tire
I really liked the quiet, soft tire. Today, I pulled a TAZ 2104 out of a snowbank, while standing on rolled ice snow slightly muted by falling snow. I was pleasantly surprised that it worked without any problems. What could it have caught on...? Five plus for the tire!!!!
Pros: Loose and rolled snow, "mash", ice is great.
Cons: On dry asphalt 120 km/h and above it floats a

An excellent winter tire at a low price
I drove on these tires in all weather conditions. The passability on snow is stunning (has helped out more than once) On pure ice in warm weather, they lose to studded tires. Otherwise, all pluses
Pros: passability on snow and ice
Cons: did not find

An excellent tire, but... FOR ONE SEASON!

VAZ-2112 16kl. disks VSMPO R14 Before this winter, Gislaved Nord Frost-3 studded tire - five seasons with an average mileage of 10-15 thousand km. There are practically no complaints, I really liked it in all weather conditions. I could have driven further as the wear allowed, but not only the metal gets old, and I decided not to risk it, having driven

Not a bad choice.

Operating experience is around 20 thousand kilometers. Tires for quiet, moderate city driving. Definitely not for racers. Sometimes it surprises with its grip on the road surface, regardless of whether it's wet or dry. On ice, it sometimes creates the feeling that you're driving on studded tires, but when turning on ice, there is a tendency to skid, immediately reminding you that you're on non-studded tires. The tire is very quiet,

I'm still satisfied!

Renault Megane II, size 205/55 R 16, average driving style, season 2008-2009. I chose them for a long time, but stopped at Bridgestone! Price 845 грн/each. Mileage for the winter ~13,000 km (City - 65%, highway - 35%). Had to drive on different roads, city, region, Carpathians, mountains, passes. Snow is their element

Excellent tires!

Great tires for urban, especially broken roads. But in warm weather on rolled snow or bare ice, you need to be extremely careful and keep a distance. In frost, there is no equal - just super, the colder, the better. I've caught many potholes - the result is obvious - not a single blowout. I'll repeat again: on studded tires, you need to be very careful on perfect bare ice or rolled snow in warm weather. Car