Tyre reviews Yokohama Ice Guard IG50+. Page 6 599

Excellent tire... Soft, noiseless 205/60/16. Balanced well, moves smoothly through a snowy mess and handles ice relatively well.

It performs well on asphalt, well on loose snow, ice topped with Moscow's reagents and slush – a bit worse. But I don't know which tire would handle this. It doesn't like driveway ice covered in snow.

On my previous car I was driving on Yokohama IG50 tyres which I really enjoyed, so when I got my new car I decided to stick with the same type and ordered the new IG50+ model. In my opinion, it's the best price-to-quality ratio. It offers excellent handling and braking, and is also relatively quiet.

I drove on the old model for 7 winters. I bought this one with the confidence that it would be better than the old one, and it is. The tire is very soft. Balance was not required. It simply jumps over the asphalt joints and tram tracks.

Don't forget that it's not snow-tread on ice!!! Good luck on the road!

The tires meet their price. There is nothing impressive about them. But there are no outright failures either. Acoustic comfort is good, on dry and wet asphalt - well, weak in puddles and in snowfall, but the reaction is expected. The Blizzak VRX would be better. The manufacturing quality is faultless.

Just got into winter. Drove from -5 to +7 degrees. So far, so good. Quiet and confident. Didn't drive on ice, but it's obvious that only studded tires are good for it, don't expect miracles. There was one unpleasant moment, however, on damp asphalt at +3 degrees, an emergency stop wasn't sharp enough, unpleasantly slid a few meters. At similar conditions, the summer Michelin tire showed better performance. Let's see what comes

I recommend.

Thank you, pleased

Thank you, we are waiting for the second pair. Something is not coming together.

Fine. 12:26