Tyre reviews Maxxis AT-811 Razr AT. Page 3 223
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
The AT tire itself is not bad. It behaves decently in mud, doesn't clean itself very well. On the highway, the maximum comfortable speed for it is 120-130. It doesn't make much noise. It's moderately soft, not prone to tilting. In comparison to the Nokian Outpost which is on another car, Maxxis significantly loses.
- Vehicle:
- JAC T9
- Size:
- 275/65 R18 116T
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- City:
- Rostov-on-Don
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Excellent tires, there is some noise on the asphalt from them, but it's not annoying. On dirt roads, field roads - excellent. I haven't been in serious mud yet, but in the one I was in compared to Hankook Dynapro AT-m - it's just great. On asphalt, handling is excellent, braking is also good.
As for wear resistance, I don't know, at the moment of 10k mileage, there is almost no wear, I hope they won't wear out badly.
- Vehicle:
- УАЗ Patriot
- Size:
- 265/70 R16 112T
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Саратов
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
I've driven about 5000 miles on these tires:
1. 2000 km - long trip
2. 3000 km - mixed (city, dirt, didn't drive in mud)
I bought these tires with trips in mind and will continue to use them, the tires are a complete delight, not noisy, light, I'm more satisfied than I expected) I recommend them, in this size they look great on the tank- Vehicle:
- Tank 300
- Size:
- 265/70 R17 116T
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Кострома
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I sincerely do not understand why everyone praises this tire in reviews. COMPLETE DISAPPOINTMENT. After reading the rave reviews, I took it as an AT for everyday use. Expectations: comfort while driving, handling, aggressive tread pattern, and acoustic comfort was not important. In fact, I got the opposite effect. It seems that with a small mass, the tire itself is hard and any unevenness and asphalt joints shake the car so much that it creates the impression that the wheels are about to fall off, which was not even the case with the super-heavy MT from Nitto. Changing the pressure does not affect this in any way. At the same time, with the stiffness of the tread itself, the sidewall is non-existent, which makes it lose a lot in handling. In the end, compared to the rather mediocre Hankook Dynapro ATM of the same size, which has traveled over 100,000 kilometers, I noticeably lost comfort and handling with the Maxxis. There are also problems with braking, if the Hankook did not brake very well, especially on wet roads, slipping into skidding, then with the Maxxis, the brakes themselves are not enough to absorb the energy of the heavy tire, which makes the informativeness suffer, it is impossible to adequately dose the brake. In short, a Chinese product is a Chinese product, no matter what.
If you take a tire for 50/50 asphalt and dirt, then okay, but if your main driving is on asphalt and rarely on dirt, then this is definitely one of the worst choices.
DEFINITELY REMOVING AND SELLING ON AVITO.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi L200
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Balances well, does not make noise. The rubber is soft, so far it suits me! I had Hankook Dynapro MT before, very good, but mostly asphalt, that's why I changed it.
- Vehicle:
- УАЗ Patriot
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Installed on L200 80% city, rest medium off-road. Extremely uncomfortable tire for city driving. As they say, China in all its glory. Despite relatively low weight for AT tire, comfort is exactly like on super-heavy Nitto mud tires with 2cm sidewall, didn't feel any difference. No zero on the wheel, constantly wobbles, catches ruts on asphalt. At the same time, the steering wheel is noticeably heavier after switching from winter Bridgestone. Any pothole affects the entire body, feels like inertia of unsprung masses, tire handles unevenness very poorly. This tire is a ticket to frequent visits to the service station for suspension repairs. Absolutely helpless in mud, needs full gas to clean itself. Due to the transverse tread pattern, it doesn't hold course, constantly drifts into ruts and potholes and can't get out of them. Previous Hankook Dynapro with a more civilian tread pattern behaved more adequately and confidently off-road. Picks up stones and gravel from the road like a magnet, damaging the body and windshields of cars behind.
Of the advantages, only acoustic comfort and good resistance to aquaplaning and braking on wet asphalt, same as Hankook, which would hydroplane at medium speed and not brake in the rain. But you pay for it with accelerated wear. wore out noticeably over 2 seasons.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi L200
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Installed at the end of winter - February. They handle snow well. On ice, you need to drive carefully. On the highway and dry asphalt after 80, they are a bit noisy. They balanced out perfectly. I haven't checked the consumption yet, but they are heavier than summer tires - probably will be about 100% more. I recommend purchasing them.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
- Size:
- 265/60 R18 110T
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
The best tires. I have driven over 3000 km on mountain roads with them. All indicators are excellent. I believe this is the best tire in terms of price = quality.
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Tucson
- Size:
- 225/65 R17 106H
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Красноармейская
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Everything is fine so far. I've driven on it on highways at speeds of 130-150, on small dirt roads, and in heavy rain - it was comfortable everywhere.
- Vehicle:
- Tank 300
- Size:
- 265/65 R17 112T
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability



