Tyre reviews Кама Евро 129. Page 32 606
- Rate
Slips on sudden acceleration. Otherwise, a perfectly acceptable tire.
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Octavia 1,8L Turbo 1997-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Noisy, harsh, poor ride quality.
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Octavia 1,8L Turbo 1997-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I could have forgiven the noise and stiffness of this tire if it wasn't for the wear. 40,000 km and it's shot - I won't be buying another one.
- Vehicle:
- Chrysler Sebring 2,7L 2001-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Held the road well but wore down quickly after 2 seasons almost bald.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Abysmal tire. Noisy, hard, one hits, the other drags on the wheel, even on deflated feels like driving on wooden wheels.
- Vehicle:
- Opel Corsa C 1,4L 2002-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Spent a week with a 14" Continental on the passenger sedan, then switched to a 15" Continental. The Conti Premium Contact 2 is noticeably noisier. Otherwise, the difference is negligible. Verdict: Kumho is a good tire.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Vento 1,6L 1992-1998
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Road holding is good, braking is good.
- High wear, lasted for a season. VAZ-21154- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Worn out after 18,000 km! What a waste of money!
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Almera Classic 1.6L 2006-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
185/60 R14
After a couple of months of operation, a sidewall bulge appeared on one of the wheels (hit a pothole), otherwise everything is fine, normal tire- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
yes, like, nothing so far.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Magentis 2,0L 2005-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability