Tyre reviews Кама Бриз. Page 10 9414

I don't like paying extra for a brand because I know that in normal Russian conditions, I need nothing more than a good bead. So I've been running on the Breeze for two seasons after the Yokohama - I'll make it for at least another half-season by the wear.

Eco-class, yes, balance - a maximum of 15 grams, dry grip is great, wet grip is good. I don't hear any noise, my insulation is quite good.

I bought the Kamaz-232 tyres in the size 175/70R14.
Pros: 1) Cheap price, 2) Durable, 3) Excellent dry-road handling.
Cons: 1) Less comfortable than well-known brands, 2) A bit uncertain on a wet road.
I would recommend this tire for the price.

They picked up two front tires at the tire shop somehow. Had to put an egg-shaped tire on the rear. Don't even get me started on balancing (normal). Ordered through the internet with delivery, yes, no issues there. No guarantee for replacing a faulty tire, and no receipt confirming I'm the happy owner of this tire. Dreaming of winter to change them. Next summer, I'll be shopping for something better, or at least with a 10 km guarantee to get away from

Honestly, the noise and wear ratings may not be completely objective. Noise-wise because I drive on a VAZ, and wear-wise because on the CAMS first season. Overall, the tire is worth its money, I'm satisfied with the purchase.

Mileage is still relatively low, but first impressions are already emerging. The tire is working, with no extreme demands placed on the road surface, handling well on patched roads, and I don't see a need to slow down on "repaved" sections.

Продольное сцепление плохое- срываются в букс на ускорении и горят на торможении.
Поперечная устойчивость норм. Видимо состав резины такой, непровар что-ли.

Давайте бороться за бесплатную доставку. Или хотя бы плотить только за одно колесо.

Ок

Не советую , все 4 шины кривые. Возврат не делают

Рекомендую