Tyre reviews Bridgestone Turanza T005. Page 1 530
- Rate
I didn’t experiment and took what the Mazda 6 is fitted with today, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 225/45 R19. Before that, I had the Turanza T001. The T001's shoulders are certainly commendable, but the model is being phased out (as I was told), so the choice fell on the T005. I was pleasantly surprised by the T001. It’s actually softer than the T001. I was driving on the road and there
- Vehicle:
- Mazda 6
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
I mounted these tires on my vehicle at the beginning of the summer of 2021. Over the summer I managed to rack up around 10,000 kilometers. The tires performed admirably throughout the summer: excellent stability even in extreme heat on scorching asphalt, and excellent aquaplaning resistance in the heavy downpours. They gripped the road well, including on road segments with a mix of asphalt and unevenness. I have not had the opportunity to use them on any roads
- Vehicle:
- Audi A6 Allroad
- Size:
- 225/55 R17 97W
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
For me, as a 22-year experience, the perfect tyre so far. Before that, there were Bridgestones, Kumhos and Hankooks. There is no noise. The car runs perfectly, accelerates faster, subjectively. Brakes - above all praise. There were two situations on the road, on wet and dry asphalt, when I was visually conveyed into the bumper of another car, but no, I was actually thrilled. Fuel consumption decreased by 0.5 litres under equal
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Tiida
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Ran on Mazda again.
Aquaplaning is normal, and it feels good in the lane.
Maximum acceleration of 217 km/h by GPS, everything is normal. At speeds of 150-170 on an empty straight road in summer it feels great.
The tire is not noisy, of medium hardness.- Vehicle:
- Mazda 6
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Tires - pure bliss. I'm having a blast while driving, the car behaves impeccably. All the turns and curves of the road are going smoothly. During rain, there are no complications, we're not flying over puddles, there's silence in the cabin.
- Vehicle:
- BMW X3
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I would definitely recommend them for purchase, the tyres are simply on fire. The car holds the road perfectly on any road and it would take a lot of effort to send the car into a skid. I've already driven 10,000 km, the wear is almost imperceptible, as always, the tread is at the optimal level of wear.
- Vehicle:
- Honda Accord
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tire has performed well, been driven on a Camry with a tire size of 215/55R17 for 26,000 miles, on various roads – both good and bad, in rain and heat. In the rain, the tire does not aquaplane, and in the groove, it runs smoothly in both dry and flooded conditions without any jolts or swerving. It has taken some serious potholes and the tire is intact, not punctured, and not de
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Camry
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Driving in the rain is simply magical. The tires grip the commands sharply, without any slippage. Braking is effective in 100% of cases. After 2 seasons, the rubber state is excellent, the lugs and ribs look like they haven't worked on wear at all.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Rio
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been driving for two months now, and at a price that's very reasonable, it handles speed amazingly, doesn't understeer in turns, I've already encountered two potholes, so much so that I thought my teeth were going to fall out, but no signs of a bulge, in general, it holds potholes.
- Vehicle:
- Audi A4
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought this tire as a replacement. My car is a Tiguan 2, it had Yokohama AE 50 tires installed from the factory. I can say for sure that after switching to Bridgestone, my fuel consumption increased by 0.5 to 1 liter, and the tires are very noisy. Previously, when driving on the highway with Yokohama tires, I could only hear the wind noise, but now the hum from the Bridgestone tires drowns out all other noises, and the hum gets louder as the speed increases. Also, the EU label on the website does not match the label on the tire. The reality is that the fuel consumption is C, handling on wet roads is B, and noise is 72 dB. However, I must admit that in all other parameters, safety, handling, stability, and impact resistance, Bridgestone is significantly better than Yokohama.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Tiguan
- Buy again?:
- Absolutely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability