Tyre reviews Bridgestone Blizzak REVO GZ. Page 9 520
- Rate
Can't compare to nothing, was riding on Belshina, was driving and skidding around, but then went to the market for Nokian RS and bought Bridgestone, liked the thoughtful tread pattern, from advanced, thoughtful, put them on, balancing surprised even the tire fitter, rarely does it happen so perfectly up to 10 grams. When accelerating with wheelspin on packed snow, felt traction, (Belshina was practically stuck in place) and the brakes were excellent.
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Guys bought Bridgestone this autumn, paid 2,200 for the tires. Impressions - just super! There was a choice between Yokohama and Bridgestone, chose the latter and didn't regret it! On my VAZ 2105, I'll say straight out, I drive on snow and ice like on dry asphalt in the summer, i.e. at the same pace and speed. The only thing it doesn't like is a sharp start with wheel spin, both
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2110 1.5L 1996-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Hello everyone. I've always preferred Bridgestone tires. In the fall, I bought REVO GZ. Before that, I drove on WS 60. I have both positive and negative impressions of the new tires. The positive thing is that driving on new tires on dry and wet asphalt is just as enjoyable as driving on summer tires. Honestly. But the vaunted characteristics of driving and braking on ice disappointed me. And here, let Bridgestone not be offended. Since we had constant
- Vehicle:
- Lexus IS 250 RWD 2.5L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I can only compare the Bridgestone to the Yokohama G20. The Bridgestone is more rigid, which is due to its harder sidewall. It was balanced with 25-gram weights, but one tire required an additional 50 grams. I purchased it because I was constantly getting punctures with the soft Yokohama on potholes. The car's behavior is contradictory - acceleration and braking have improved, but entering turns is not as smooth, the Yokohama held
- Vehicle:
- Daihatsu YRV 1,3L 2000-2005
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Excellent!
Compared to domestic studded tires, it's like heaven and earth. It holds the road like on ice and on snow. At speeds above 120, it starts to skid. In terms of noise, up to 100 km/h, it's inaudible. For the winter period, wear is 0% (approximately).
Pros: price - quality- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
excellent tire
- Vehicle:
- ВАЗ Priora
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
They handle the road well both on ice and in "mush". 👍👍👍 I used to drive on studded tires and was worried that the "soft" tires wouldn't meet my expectations, but I was wrong. They are worth the money.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Juke
- Size:
- 215/55 R17 94S
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Ставрополь
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Great tires for the money!
- Vehicle:
- Kia K5
- Size:
- 205/55 R16 91S
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Ноябрьск
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good tire, nothing better than Bridgestone has been invented yet, those who drive on Bridgestone will understand??
- Vehicle:
- Lada Priora
- Size:
- 175/65 R14 82S
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Rostov-on-Don
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Very good tires, I advise others
- Vehicle:
- Lada Vesta
- Size:
- 185/65 R15 88S
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Нальчик
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability