Tyre reviews Кама Евро 228. Page 2 36

Quality-to-price ratio matches our standard of living, and we sought exactly that.

If not to be picky, the tires are not bad, of course, for their price. They run well on light off-road, sand, meadow, grass, and even on snow, the passability is decent.

The tires are good, durable rubber, quite comfortable, not too noisy, but they are more for summer, for the city. I put studded tires in the winter.

In winter, I prefer real winter tires with studs, for all other cases, Kama 228 is suitable. The tires are not muddy, but for sandy and rocky dirt roads, they are fine for me. They are also okay for city driving. I drive in a pensioner mode.

The standard option was for the Niva. Since lately I haven't been driving into extreme off-road, and this tire was suitable for both asphalt and dirt roads, and decent on snow in winter, although I don't drive much in winter. Now I couldn't find it, so I took a new Kama 365.

Hello!
I drove on the manufacturer's tyres for 30,000 km or 6 years,
I bought new KAMAZ EVA 228 tyres on your website in 2016.
Overall, spring, summer, autumn perform well,
except for mud, as the tread quickly wears out.
In winter, not satisfactory.
The price-to-quality ratio is in line.
Special thanks to the Mosavtohina

For the track it's fine with a slight exit into dry woods. In the snow, it's losing traction in 10cm. On ice, it's like a cow - if you don't mind the studs, you can drive on them, but it's better not to take the risk!

Worth every penny.

In winter, I scrape the snow with the bumper, push through mud, drive on dirt roads. As a fisherman and hunter, I'm often on Lake, Chany, Sartlan, Sargul. The pros are the price, traction. And for winter, nail-on studs are better.

Bad tire, hazardous to safety.