Tyre reviews Кама 205. Page 5 119

  • Кама 205
    Кама 205

Статистика отзывов на шины Кама 205

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Кама 205 пользователями сайта: 3.41 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Кама 205: 119 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 1722
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 885
  • Место в рейтинге (всесезонные): 255
Control on a dry road
Steering in the wet
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Quiet in motion
Rate
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Кама 205 по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
9%
2
20%
3
3%
4
44%
5
24%
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    1

    I strongly advise against purchasing these tires! Let me explain. The fuel consumption with them is enormous due to the poor tread. For example, my fuel tank used to be enough for a trip from Rostov to Sochi, which is 600 km. But when I put on the Camu tires, the fuel ran out at 400 km and that's on the highway! In both cases, I was driving at a speed of 90-100 km/h. I won't even mention

    Vehicle:
    VAZ 2114  1.5L  2001-2008
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    3.1

    It behaves very poorly on wet and slightly dirty roads, you literally feel like a cow on ice. It's clear that normal driving in the winter is out of the question. At the same time, the Kama 205 has passed almost 50,000 km quite well and without problems - it will last a little longer.

    Vehicle:
    VAZ 2114  1.5L  2001-2008
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    1.4

    It's just terrible tires! I put them on my car (I have a VAZ 2110), and it started pulling to the right! I went to a suspension auto service, and it was in excellent condition! It turned out to be a tread defect (it was written that the tire was non-directional, but it was directional), because when I swapped the wheels from left to right, everything changed!

    Vehicle:
    VAZ 2110  1.5L  1996-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    2.2

    Terrible tires

    Stood from the salon on 210994-20. On dry asphalt, it drives up to 140 somehow, but above that, it becomes dangerous, it's better not to risk entering a turn at speed, aquaplaning is generally terrible, and it refuses to brake on wet asphalt. Moreover, it's very noisy.

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    2.7

    For dry weather

    Quite decent tires, but not without drawbacks... The biggest drawback, in my opinion, is the huge tendency to aquaplaning, both when braking and when cornering at a relatively low speed (80 km/h), in a fairly gentle turn, though in a downpour... When braking on wet asphalt, it easily slides into a skid...

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    4.2

    Budget tire

    For its money, it's okay! There's something to compare, starting from Rosava and ending with Nokian and Debica, so if you compare it with Debica, the rubber is much better, quieter, softer, and on wet roads, it's not like on skates. The tread pattern is a bit weak for winter, but there's winter tires for that. And for everyday driving, it's just right. Rosava has become square after 20

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    3.2

    Good

    Vehicle:
    ВАЗ 2115
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    1.8

    A rare puncture, after the Michelins got blown out on wet pavement, the other two tires slid right off the road and wouldn't stick to the asphalt.

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen Polo Sedan
    Buy again?:
    Absolutely not
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    3.7

    I'm completely satisfied.

    Vehicle:
    Lada Калина
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Кама 205

    Rate
    3.1

    Good. Just not fond of puddles!!!

    Vehicle:
    VAZ 21061  1.5L  
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability