Tyre reviews Gislaved Nord Frost 100. Page 24 543

Everything's okay, but it's a bit noisy after the first 1000 km.

On ice it is very good, on asphalt it is good, on snow it is normal. The noise is low. I am satisfied!

I rode the season on Nord Frost 5, was satisfied, so now I'm taking Nord Frost 100. Quality proven, and the price, compared to competitors, is pleasing.

A well-balanced tire, trouble-free handling.

I do not recommend these tires, I purchased them for 3 cars. Operation in different regions. The studs fall out, wear off.

The tires are complete crap, after 15,000 km they've worn down almost completely (but honestly, given our winters, practically no asphalt mileage) if I'm being honest I regret buying them, I would have taken something way better, with a lot of treads, and not aluminum like here.

These tires fall short of the Catalunha 5, which I had expected to be an improvement over the 100. In the snow, they understeer and oversteer and make more noise than the 5, which grip the ice worse... in general, a disaster.

Hello! The good tyres I used to have were fine, I enjoyed driving with them. I wanted to buy a new one for the winter, but the studs are really expensive and are a real eyesore. All my desire to buy a new one from Gislaved has been killed!

Today I put on...(Murmansk), and the snow melted... going well on the wet asphalt, completely no noise. Waiting for our harsh weather!!!

Unfortunately, the user did not write a comment on their review.