Tyre reviews Gislaved Eurofrost 3 75

The first impressions are positive.

I've driven several hundred kilometers, I'm very pleased...I hope it won't let me down in further use...only the tread is noisy...I used to drive on Zhiguli...you understand, the tires weren't that great...but with this tire, I felt the difference...I recommend taking this tire and forgetting about the road.

Don't buy this tire, it's not for our winters

Car Fiat Doblo 1.6 16v. Kiev. Mileage 2 seasons, about 10,000 km. I was going to buy NordFrost 3, but I didn't find it. Time was pressing, so I had to put on what was left at the tire shop - non-liquid EuroFrost 3. I ask car enthusiasts to pay attention to the fact that these tires are

Interesting combination

Before this tire, I only used studded, good ones. I've thought about it multiple times, that in Crimea, with its mild winter, non-studded tires are needed. I couldn't find Michelin tires of the same size in stock, so I took this one. Its obvious advantage is the almost complete absence of noise, great behavior on wet roads, and snowy (dusted) roads. I decided to test it in extreme modes - I drove to Old

A decent winter tire

On snow, even rolled, thawed porridge, wet, dry road, it goes confidently, on polished ice like on skates - completely uncontrollable, but it's not hard to catch the transition by switching to a lower gear up to 1. On a steep (40%) icy climb from spilled water from a hatch, it didn't make it. In general, to drive on ice, you need to be friends with your head on any tire, in

The optimal price-quality ratio

I read the reviews of my fellow drivers and I'm amazed: How can you compare EF and NF - they are different tires in terms of composition and application... Crimea, 2007. Ice. The road from the Yalta hotel upwards. I reduced the pressure to 0.7-1 atm and calmly drove up the hill on 2nd gear. And my colleagues were spinning their wheels on studded and non-studded tires nearby.... This is ice

Excellent winter tires
Lanos, 175/70/R13, 1000 km on EF3. The tires easily handle climbs on icy cobblestone.
Pros: Excellent handling on snow, ice, wet and dry asphalt.
Cons: At 80 km/h and above, the tires start to hum.

Good
Lanос 175/65/14 I'm driving the first season. Not bad tire for non-Siberian winters. The only significant disadvantage is on ice - it's weak.
Pros: well holds snow, slush, wet road
Cons: ice, a bit noisy

Good

Yesterday, I blew out one. I've been driving down the hill from the ring road for a long time, and what do you think? It was like flying down on a sled. To avoid crashing into the oncoming Camry, I had to drive up onto the curb. As a result, the tire got torn. Today, I'm buying a new one!!! MORAL: You need to keep a close eye on this tire on ice!!!!!!!!!

I like
I didn't have the opportunity to evaluate the pros and cons due to the lack of winter weather. I was a bit puzzled that they were made in Romania
Pros: quietness
Cons: I'll refrain for now

Quite a good winter tire.
It behaves quite well on both ice and snow, ice is difficult to handle but with the right driving style and in the city it behaves predictably, out of town I didn't like how it behaves in mud, it throws worse than on ice, but overall the impression is good.
Pros: successful tread pattern
Cons: not noticed