Tyre reviews Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000. Страница 8 682
Есть что рассказать о шине Bridgestone Ice Cruiser 7000?
Написать отзыв- Rate
Excellent tires, runs well on clean asphalt, accelerated to 180 km/h, holds well on ice, studs help, much better than studs in comparison to slippery, excellent directional stability, brakes well, drives well in deep snow, doesn't get stuck, sturdy sidewall is not afraid of ruts, very good tires, I would recommend to everyone, you won't regret it.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Primera 2,0L 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Very satisfied with it. Brakes are great, steering is precise, no wheelspin even on clear asphalt. On any surface: snow, ice, slush, mud, deep powder snow, compacted snow. Lane-changing and overtaking on the highway is great. Also great at climbing uphill. I have never had such control over the vehicle (previously drove a Hyundai H-1 and then a Korean Nexo).
Increased resistance when accelerating, especially uphill.
Light
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Lancer X 1.5L 2007-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I give tire 5
It holds well on any surface. On dry and wet asphalt better than on ice-road.
The studs don't fall off at all! Although I ride 6 times a day by rail crossing!
In short, I recommend.
I drove on Dunlop DS2, no questions, it's good. But Bridgestone inspires more confidence! On ice-road I once drove on frosty asphalt in fog. Car accident- Vehicle:
- VAZ Priora (2170) 1.5L 2007-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Very good tire, running for the second season, no complaints even at 170 km/h, does not float and does not rumble, all studs in place, holds ice normally, there is a small side slip on ice, but that's within normal limits. Very good braking on asphalt and on a wet road. (215/65R16)
- Vehicle:
- Subaru Forester 2,0L 2008-
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Great tire for the Northern city of Arkhangelsk - 5 stars! Performs well on ice and snow, didn't get stuck and didn't get stuck in the drifts! For those who value safety over comfort!
Drawbacks: Noisy, wooden, all the bumps are felt! High fuel consumption!
Conclusion: Will continue to ride and get a new one!
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Accent 1,6L 2002-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
205/55/16
No studs were lost in 2 seasons. Excellent grip on dry, wet and snowy asphalt both in town and on the highway.
On a dirt road it holds steadily at speeds up to 70km, at higher speeds it starts to float.
Overall a great winter tire for city use.- Vehicle:
- Peugeot 307 1,6L 2001-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've tried it on different winter tires and this one is probably one of the best. They wrote about its noisiness, but I guess the user was driving with open windows or on a karting track. The tire is absolutely quiet, you forget that it has studs and you drive as if it's summer. I've tried Cordiant, Matador and other domestic "good" tires, but the difference is huge, especially on the track. Over the season I didn't lose even one
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Dion 2,0L 2000-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been riding on Dunlop GrandTrek SJ6 for two seasons, and the tire has been great, except for the ice. I decided to put in studs for the ice, and overall I'm very happy with the tire. Compared to the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7 (which I've personally tested), it grips well on dry pavement, and the noise level is just right - I wouldn't say it's too loud, and I haven't lost any ear sensitivity.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Land Cruiser 120 4,0L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tire has performed well overall by a 4+. It handles well on a small snow flurry, but as soon as the snow pile is 10 cm high, it floats across the entire road. It brakes slightly better on a wet road than on ice, and of course, it’s completely useless on ice. In corners it slides at 40 km/h, but basically it’s tolerable at that speed. I drove through drifts little, but didn’t get stuck even once.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Laguna II 1,6 2001-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Prior to this tire, I was running a Cordiant stud, with a handling rating of 3+, and a noise rating of 1-. However, this tire is a different story altogether, with no ice handling whatsoever, but decent performance on snow. Unfortunately, it also produces a 4+ level of noise. To be honest, for the price I paid, I expected much more, and I would not recommend this tire to anyone.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Corolla 1,6L 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability