Tyre reviews Bridgestone B250. Page 2 346
- Rate
I drive a VAZ 21099. I'm comparing it with the "Kamaeuro" that was previously on. It's much more comfortable! I was pressing the pedal to the floor (160 km/h) and it holds perfectly! It's not noisy too much, there's almost no difference between a dry and a wet road. I haven't tried it on ice or snow because it was bought for summer. Wear after 6000 km is not noticeable. Braking is perfect
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I used these tires on the front for 2 years, with around 20,000 km on them, and they've worn down to the wear indicators. When they were new, they felt great: you really can't hear them, and in the rain the car behaves like it's on dry pavement, with zero aquaplaning. I didn't change them for winter, and the handling/braking on slush/snow is super/super, on packed snow it's normal/ca
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 21061 1.5L
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tires came with the car, stock 15-inch radius. I've done almost 0 km in 4 seasons with aggressive driving. By wear resistance, punctures, handling, braking, and fuel efficiency, it's a solid 5-star rating!!!
They are noisy, but tolerable. Aquaplaning is average. I hit a big puddle once and hit it sharply with one side - the steering wheel was hard to hold.
I accelerated it to
- Vehicle:
- Honda Civic 1,8L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Pretty good, even excellent
I have a VAZ-21074 with a fuel injection system (2008) - it’s somehow not listed in the model range, a Kamaz-5328 (the stock one) wore out in three years and I’ve been driving on V250 tires made in Indonesia for a year now. It immediately became quieter, softer, and more stable. I didn’t notice a significant difference between driving in dry and wet conditions. They say it's loud,
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 21061 1.5L
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been using them for 3 years, excellent tires, quiet, stable in any weather in the summer. The first snow and like a cow on ice. Need to be changed in positive weather as usual. Got a blowout on one tire due to a flat, didn't have time to get them all changed. Driven on them for 3 seasons at the sea, and I still think they'll last for 2 more years. Highly recommend them to everyone, will only buy a
- Vehicle:
- Fiat Grande Punto 1,4L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Used 185/70 R14 on Camry S41 (1997) 2L.
Great tire. Holds the road perfectly.
Aggressive driving style. Doesn't slip in a skid. Excellent braking.
Low wear due to the hard rubber composition.
Aquaplaning in order, ABS activates at very hard braking.
Noise? Expected it after reading reviews, before purchasing.
Expectations not met - no- Vehicle:
- Toyota Camry 2,0L 1987-1991
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The car's mileage is 75,000 km, excluding winter mileage of approximately 35,000 km, driven on Bridgestone B250 tires.
Pros - price, behaves well up to 140 km/h, beyond that it's very noisy
Cons - wears out completely during sharp braking, extended braking distance during sharp braking (over 150m at 160 km/h), frequent wheel spin on asphalt- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Accent 1,5L 2000-2002
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Very good tire. Came with the car. Drove on it for one summer, no problems arose.
I advise everyone to take Bridgestone B250 for class B and C cars or for domestic ones.
Fully satisfied with the choice.- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Accent 1,6L 2002-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
Poor
They stood when buying a new Opel Astra H. With a 1.4 engine, under ABS, the tires lasted 30,000 km. The tread is worn to a minimum, the entire tire has scratches and cracks, as if it's 10 years old.
Cons: rapid wear- Rate
Decent stock tires
The tires came with a Hyundai Accent, 1.4 mech without ABS. Frequent wheel spin at the traffic light, at high speeds I enter turns, handbrake to squeal with skidding. The tread is virtually untouched, both front and rear are in excellent condition. Trips from Kiev to Boryspil on asphalt (dry up to 170 km/h, wet up to 140 km/h) - holds the road perfectly. A trip to
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability